Patrick Kane vs Chris Chelios

[Bouboumaster]

Peak/Prime > Kane

But I'd take Chelios because of career, and also because he was a nasty S.O.B.

 

[ForsbergForever]

Kane is washed up at 36, at that age Chelios had multiple Norris-level seasons left in the tank and was an Olympian at 44 y/o. It's no contest.

 

[Felidae]

Yeah I'm surprised Kane hasn't aged that well. He hasn't been a PPG for about 3 seasons in an era where a PPG is good for around top 30-40 in scoring.

 

[Romang67]

If you think the answer is Kane you are wrong and too young. You only watched him on the Wings after he already had first ballot HHOF career.

Look at Chelios' Norris finishes. 1,1,1,2,2,3

This is against very tough competition. Bourque, Leetch. Macinnis. Coffey. Lidstrom.

Chicago Wolves / Atlanta Thrashers legend Chris Chelios played on the Wings?

 

[SimpleJack]

Yeah I'm surprised Kane hasn't aged that well. He hasn't been a PPG for about 3 seasons in an era where a PPG is good for around top 30-40 in scoring.

He’s actually aged better than most, just not as well as Chelios did. Let’s not act like Kane fell off like Toews, Keith, and Seabrook(the rest of that core) did. He’s lasted well into his 30s as a legit star in this league and even to this day is still putting up solid #s despite several injuries. And Idk how many are still averaging over a PPG that are over 35 years old, but probably very few.