Dennis Bonvie
Registered User
The Selke is as relevant as the Lady Byng. His lack of contribution is far more worrying than his chances for a trophy
I'm gonna have to say that statement is incorrect.
The Selke is as relevant as the Lady Byng. His lack of contribution is far more worrying than his chances for a trophy
The Selke is as relevant as the Lady Byng. His lack of contribution is far more worrying than his chances for a trophy
Bergeron is still a good player despite the disappointing start. He can be the best 3rd line center in the NHL and skate with plugs if he isn't going to score with 2 elite wingers on his line.
Just common sense.
Sorry but his lack of scoring is a problem.
Bergeron is Bergeron. Even at his worst in a bad slump carrying whatever ailment he still the best third line center you can hope for.
The fact that there is ZERO chance of this happening (like playing Jagr with Krejci was never going to happen thanks to Horton and Lucic) is what I am ranting about.
I like Bergeron too people are acting like I kicked there dog because I dared say something like I want him to wake up and not be on pace to finish the year with 25-30 points.
I would healthy scratch Krug to send a message to him that we need offense. Bergeron I'd just take off the line with Pasternak and Marchand for a few games.
Bergeron is Bergeron. Even at his worst in a bad slump carrying whatever ailment he still the best third line center you can hope for.
The fact that there is ZERO chance of this happening (like playing Jagr with Krejci was never going to happen thanks to Horton and Lucic) is what I am ranting about.
I like Bergeron too people are acting like I kicked there dog because I dared say something like I want him to wake up and not be on pace to finish the year with 25-30 points.
I would healthy scratch Krug to send a message to him that we need offense. Bergeron I'd just take off the line with Pasternak and Marchand for a few games.
How can Bergeron went from dominating in the WC to producing like a 4th liner even if he's playing with two of the most productive wingers in the game? No doubt he's playing injured. Only explanation.
The day he starts to produce like the Bergy we know, the wins will pile up again. Eight players have more points. He's tied with Chara. Time to wake up Patrice.
How can Bergeron went from dominating in the WC to producing like a 4th liner even if he's playing with two of the most productive wingers in the game? No doubt he's playing injured. Only explanation.
The day he starts to produce like the Bergy we know, the wins will pile up again. Eight players have more points. He's tied with Chara. Time to wake up Patrice.
How can Bergeron went from dominating in the WC to producing like a 4th liner even if he's playing with two of the most productive wingers in the game? No doubt he's playing injured. Only explanation.
The day he starts to produce like the Bergy we know, the wins will pile up again. Eight players have more points. He's tied with Chara. Time to wake up Patrice.
How can Bergeron went from dominating in the WC to producing like a 4th liner even if he's playing with two of the most productive wingers in the game? No doubt he's playing injured. Only explanation.
The day he starts to produce like the Bergy we know, the wins will pile up again. Eight players have more points. He's tied with Chara. Time to wake up Patrice.
People were crapping on Crosby last year. Took him half the season to get going. Patrice will be fine. It's the second, third and fourth lines we should be worried about.
I subscribe to the "he must have a nagging injury" camp. However, statiistically speaking:
http://www.tsn.ca/statistically-speaking-the-best-nhl-lines-1.621279
maybe it's a high ankle sprain ala Looch a few years ago. That would explain why there's no point in letting him sit...because it just takes time whether you play or not.