it seems really strange that you would drop 1966 as the cutoff year:
1959–60 Did not qualify
1960–61 Did not qualify
1961–62 Did not qualify
1962–63 Did not qualify
1963–64 Did not qualify
1964–65 Did not qualify
1965–66 Did not qualify
1966–67 Did not qualify
Why would you start your count at the second to last of an 8 year no playoff drought?
it seems really strange that you would drop 1966 as the cutoff year:
1959–60 Did not qualify
1960–61 Did not qualify
1961–62 Did not qualify
1962–63 Did not qualify
1963–64 Did not qualify
1964–65 Did not qualify
1965–66 Did not qualify
1966–67 Did not qualify
Why would you start your count at the second to last of an 8 year no playoff drought?
I really don't see what all of the crying is about. Pacquette did a great job of getting under Chara's skin.
Pacquette asked for it when he went up high on Chara with his shove before Chara punched him. You don't accidentally throw your hands an extra foot in the air to hit Chara in the face...
I was a fan of Pacquette in the playoffs last year but he seems to be making a few too many dumb decisions this year. I would like him to be smarter.
But I don't really see a sucker punch by chara. Glove still on, not a blindside punch just a sharp right that Pacquette wasn't really prepared for, which was kind of his own fault
Not sure how this thread devolved into so much bickering, but anyway.
I really don't like the Bruins, and even I can admit Chara was completely in the right here. He literally didn't touch Pacquette during the play, so Pacquette decides to display his toughness by poking the bear. We all know you don't poke the bear.
Not sure how this thread devolved into so much bickering, but anyway.
I really don't like the Bruins, and even I can admit Chara was completely in the right here. He literally didn't touch Pacquette during the play, so Pacquette decides to display his toughness by poking the bear. We all know you don't poke the bear.
holy **** you're mad. It has nothing to do with the existence of the drought, but the fact OP decided to just pull two years out of 8 for no reason at all. maybe you should ask them why THEY brought that up since it has no relevance to anything in this thread, or in todays hockey in general?
The numbers arent wrong though, so its not a typo, thats what makes it weird.
1959–60 Did not qualify
1960–61 Did not qualify
1961–62 Did not qualify
1962–63 Did not qualify
1963–64 Did not qualify
1964–65 Did not qualify
1965–66 Did not qualify
1966–67 Did not qualify
1999–2000 Did not qualify
2000–01 Did not qualify
2005–06 Did not qualify
2006–07 Did not qualify
Maybe I'm just OCD, but its just really really weird: include the entire drought, or dont include any of it.
Not sure how this thread devolved into so much bickering, but anyway.
I really don't like the Bruins, and even I can admit Chara was completely in the right here. He literally didn't touch Pacquette during the play, so Pacquette decides to display his toughness by poking the bear. We all know you don't poke the bear.
First off, it's Paquette. Paquette. Paquette. No C.
Secondly, the playoff drought argument about them missing 50 years ago for my original comment is irrelevant. But the comment was about missing 5 out of 10 years recently, before becoming the elite team they were the last few years. I would consider that relevant.
Finally, it's hilarious seeing Bruins fans saying oh he shouldn't have picked a fight. Considering Chara started both altercations himself. Especially the second one at the end of the game when he spent almost the entire last minute chasing Paquette around and cross checking and slashing him. But hey, you guys also seem to think it was a dive, I guess his teeth took a dive from his mouth too.
No more posts from me in this thread. I'll just get in more trouble. So carry on.
If he didn't include parts of it, people would be going "Why are you counting from 1967? To avoid including the drought and make the numbers look better?", you can't win bringing up statistics. Would've probably been better to use the 40 years the poster he was responding to was referencing (as in "Tampa has won as many cups as Boston in the last 40 years").
However, I CANNOT believe you did the above!
That was 50 years ago!
Will be fun to watch their next match up.
JT Brown has some bills to pay.
I really don't see what all of the crying is about. Pacquette did a great job of getting under Chara's skin.
ummm, ya.
how about no.
Pacquette started both altercations, and Chara finished them.
that's all that happened.
No, Chara boarded Carle. Expressing displeasure with a teammate being boarded happens all the time. Chara cross checked Paquette, Paquette pushes Chara in the shoulder/chest, Chara punches Paquette in the mouth. Later in the game, Chara spends almost the entire final minute chasing Paquette around slashing/cross checking/punching him. As play was whistled for a puck out of play, Paquette had enough and swung. What's he supposed to do? If he'd done nothing, you'd be calling him a *****. Not a person here on this forum would have the stones to do what Paquette did.
You can't cheer on Chara punching Paquette when he wasn't ready (honestly, not that it would matter Chara would destroy most people in the league) and then defend Lucic when Proust punched him when Lucic wasn't "ready" (not that I didn't giggle because Lucic loves to suckerpunch people too).