seanlinden
Registered User
- Apr 28, 2009
- 25,542
- 1,991
I think the lines decision is about trying to formulate a 3rd line that can be better than its parts, and an absolute pain in the neck for opponents.
McMann-Laughton-Domi, at least on paper, have those qualities. All 3 are more than willing to play in the dirty areas. Laughton & Domi are "middleweight tough", and McMann is the kind of guy that can absolutely burn you with a backbreaking goal on a potentially routine play.
Would I prefer to see our 2nd line be McMann-Tavares-Robertson; or our first line be Knies-Matthews-Domi? yeah. But I also get the sense that Laughton isn't really good enough to centre a Nylander or Marner-level player.
Here's the crazy thought of the day...
Knies-Matthews-Domi
Nylander-Laughton-Marner
McMann-Tavares-Robertson
Lorentz-Kampf-Jarnrkok
As a road lineup in the playoffs, kind of makes it impossible to match up against. Our big guns are all smart players, give the opposition looks they've never seen before and cannot gameplan against.
McMann-Laughton-Domi, at least on paper, have those qualities. All 3 are more than willing to play in the dirty areas. Laughton & Domi are "middleweight tough", and McMann is the kind of guy that can absolutely burn you with a backbreaking goal on a potentially routine play.
Would I prefer to see our 2nd line be McMann-Tavares-Robertson; or our first line be Knies-Matthews-Domi? yeah. But I also get the sense that Laughton isn't really good enough to centre a Nylander or Marner-level player.
Here's the crazy thought of the day...
Knies-Matthews-Domi
Nylander-Laughton-Marner
McMann-Tavares-Robertson
Lorentz-Kampf-Jarnrkok
As a road lineup in the playoffs, kind of makes it impossible to match up against. Our big guns are all smart players, give the opposition looks they've never seen before and cannot gameplan against.