T REX
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2013
- 11,498
- 8,865
Other than McDavid there's no one in the league AINEC better than Panarin. Embarrassing take.
Cool story bro. No one cares lol.
Other than McDavid there's no one in the league AINEC better than Panarin. Embarrassing take.
Cool story bro. No one cares lol.
You may call him charismatic, but i'd rather choose the word "Pejorative Slur"
You may call him charismatic, but i'd rather choose the word "Pejorative Slur"
I don't really think so. My theory on this is superstars don't get much of a benefit from a change in scenery, because their production is determined by their talent. Unless they're dragging around complete knuckle dragging plugs (which Panarin is not doing), their production is what it is.
We always assume that, but the examples we have seen of superstars in or close to their prime moving to "better" situations hasn't really shown that. Tavares didn't become a 100 point player in Toronto. Joe Thornton was doing what he was doing in Boston and San Jose - no real change there.
Panarin is a puck dominant player so I just don't see what benefit he derives from playing in Tampa versus NY. And Kucherov doesn't really benefit from having a good second and third (and frankly - fourth) line - he's getting the same tough matchups Panarin gets.
Also for a recent example of playing on Tampa not being the point jamboree is JT Miller who gets a complete massive bump playing in Vancouver over Tampa.
Only when he is drunk. But he is truly great guy, I love KuchKucherov is far better that it shouldn't even be a question, and he has much more charisma than filial Panarin
Better at hockey only when drunk? Didn't know they drink whiskey before matches.Only when he drunk. But he is truly great guy, I love Kuch
Better at able to be charismatic lol. By the way I think Kuch is better at hockey in any condition. But not to much!Better at hockey only when drunk? Didn't know they drink whiskey before matches.
Kucherov has more charisma when not drunk also.Better at able to be charismatic lol. By the way I think Kuch is better at hockey in any condition. But not to much!
Elite players produce regardless. Panarin played with the best winger in the world for two years in Chicago and those are actually his two worst seasons points wise in the NHL. Now I do realize they were his first years in the league but it's not as if Panarin suddenly became a completely new player when he got traded to Columbus. He was always elite. Sometimes playing on a stacked team can easily hurt a star player's production.I voted Kuch and get the overall sentiment of what youre saying but they literally just put random plugs who are struggling with Panarin and they automatically become PPG players. Kuch has never had a bad linemate and has not proven that he can carry scrubs (because Tampa is stacked and he doesnt need too). Not saying he couldn't do it but even in Columbus, Panarin could play with anyone in the lineup and he was still producing. Kakko hasn't scored in 20 games? Just put him with Panarin.
I don't really think so. My theory on this is superstars don't get much of a benefit from a change in scenery, because their production is determined by their talent. Unless they're dragging around complete knuckle dragging plugs (which Panarin is not doing), their production is what it is.
We always assume that, but the examples we have seen of superstars in or close to their prime moving to "better" situations hasn't really shown that. Tavares didn't become a 100 point player in Toronto. Joe Thornton was doing what he was doing in Boston and San Jose - no real change there.
Panarin is a puck dominant player so I just don't see what benefit he derives from playing in Tampa versus NY. And Kucherov doesn't really benefit from having a good second and third (and frankly - fourth) line - he's getting the same tough matchups Panarin gets.
Also for a recent example of playing on Tampa not being the point jamboree is JT Miller who gets a complete massive bump playing in Vancouver over Tampa.
He is a known panarin haterHa-ha, so much hate in you. You probably voted for Putin.
NiETLol noone of them not has it, stop with this silly nonsense.
But kucherov seems really that good as a player, panarin gives kinda bad impression when he is under the presure with the puck
No one cares about your stupid take either.
Kuch has a Hart, Ross, Lindsey and a Cup.
Lots of hardware>not a lot of hardware
Kuch has been doing it longer and better.
Not close.
Voted Kucherov but it lingers in the back of my head if Panarin could put up similar numbers in Tampa. He was tremendous last year up until the break.