PK Subban is no Drew Doughty offensively. Not being a competent PP quarterback is a part of the big ass payday and he has not shown that kind of mojo yet. He is purely a "gunner" right now. He also has issues with discipline, as the PIMs are quite high.
He is a rock defensively, but he is overrating himself if thinks he is worth such an enormous payday.
He draws more penalties than he gets.PK Subban is no Drew Doughty offensively. Not being a competent PP quarterback is a part of the big ass payday and he has not shown that kind of mojo yet. He is purely a "gunner" right now. He also has issues with discipline, as the PIMs are quite high.
He's worth more than the Habs are offering. And it doesn't sound like he wants DD type money...He is a rock defensively, but he is overrating himself if thinks he is worth such an enormous payday.
I don't see MB losing Subban by taking this tactic. Offer sheet is not going to not be matched and he isn't going to trade him.
Serious question: How does this guy show his face in the room after this...???
Serious question: How does this guy show his face in the room after this...???
Risk of losing one of the better young players in the league should suffice. I'm not a big fan of alienating players just to prove a point.
So he's just going to let him rot if they can't come to a conclusion? That's losing one of the best young d-men, basically.
We went down this path with Dryden many moons ago, it didn't make sense then, and it really doesn't make much sense now.
Serious question: How does this guy show his face in the room after this...???
Considering that Josh " we just want fair compensation" Gorges, Erik " I may just retire" Cole and Brandon " herpty derpty doo" Prust seem to be leaders in this room, I very much doubt PK should be feeling any heat. He's just following through on the groundwork laid by his PA brethren.
Serious question: How does this guy show his face in the room after this...???
He draws more penalties than he gets.
He's worth more than the Habs are offering. And it doesn't sound like he wants DD type money...
I don't believe we lost Dryden either. Infact he went on to win 4 more cups with the team.
It still negates a substantial amount of the benefit he provided by drawing penalties. 2 minutes on the penalty kill is two minutes wasted.
We lost him for an entire year because we didn't pay him full value.
That's not smart. At all. I doubt they go down the same path with Subban.
I don't see MB losing Subban by taking this tactic. Offer sheet is not going to not be matched and he isn't going to trade him. Subban isn't going anywhere.
You gotta take the good with the bad. If you're going to point to him taking penalties you should also point out that he draws them.It still negates a substantial amount of the benefit he provided by drawing penalties. 2 minutes on the penalty kill is two minutes wasted.
I don't want just a net positive. I want the net positive to be maximized. It is not as much as it could be if he reduces the penalties taken. If he only had 40 PIMs, the benefit would be even greater.Except it doesn't, because he causes more power plays than penalty kills with his antics. His fouls drawn to concede rate is a net positive. Whatever benefit he negates, he's still out ahead.
You're right in that regard it did suck. I doubt MB wants that to happen as well, but ultimately the choice is PK's.
You seriously think other teams wouldn't offer PK a contract higher than 3mill per if MB decides to let go of Subban? Have you not seen how some current teams are terrible or decimated defensively?
I don't want just a net positive. I want the net positive to be maximized. It is not as much as it could be if he reduces the penalties taken. If he only had 40 PIMs, the benefit would be even greater.
Serious question: How can Mark Bergevin look PK in the eye after the lowball **** that we're offering him?Serious question: How does this guy show his face in the room after this...???
L.A. Lariviere @L_A_theRiver
The latest from Habs D PK Subban: Agent Don Meehan, his client and family will discuss the current situation and move closer to decision.
Which would makes sense for now. However I'm still not sold that bridge contracts actually save the team any money long term. It seems that it actually ends up costing us more when the players inevitable perform well, and receive huge cash outs at the end of their 2 year contracts.
I feel there is the possibility to lock up PK to a medium-long term deal (5-6 years) at a discount compared to what I project he will end up geting paid post bridge contract. Of course, that's mostly speculation on my part.
I disagree. The choice, or onus in this case, should be a compromise between both parties, MB and PK.
If PK comes down from his 5-6 year stance, then pay him more than a 4th d-man.
If you insist on a shorter term deal, give him some incentive to do so.
PK proved that he can handle the #1 role quite admirably, and even though Markov is back, that doesn't mean that PK should have to only get paid $1M more than Matt Carkner.
If what MacKenzie, Lavoie and Dreger are reporting is true (2y $5M), Bergevin is trying to milk both ends of the cow, so to speak. (And yes, I just made cow saying up)