AttackBeacher
Registered User
- Feb 1, 2019
- 927
- 747
I’ve stopped replying, I said something once about a player and there was a threat of violence, not worth it.
threat of violence?, let's see that post pleaseI’ve stopped replying, I said something once about a player and there was a threat of violence, not worth it.
It was deleted when the moderator saw itthreat of violence?, let's see that post please
right, give us the short version, lolIt was deleted when the moderator saw it
I can’t show you something that doesn’t exist anymore. If you think I’m lying I can’t control that, most on here know my posting over the past 5/6 years, I don’t think I’ve ever had an issue with anyone. I’m not one for hyperbole or making things up.right, give us the short version, lol
I think it was when you slammed Stewart saying he would be playing on some Jr A team next year. I then replied maybe you should go down after a game and tell him that. Extreme violence. Have a good summerI can’t show you something that doesn’t exist anymore. If you think I’m lying I can’t control that, most on here know my posting over the past 5/6 years, I don’t think I’ve ever had an issue with anyone. I’m not one for hyperbole or making things up.
Life is too short, move on. We don’t agree, it is what it is
There he is, super scout,I mean Stewart will be in jr a next year? why is that a dramatic statement
He may or may not be.
society has lost it’s ability to respectfully disagree and be cordial about it. someone’s opinion on a player should t result in attacks or arrows,He's had 4 seasons and two different teams to prove he's more than a fourth line banger. Which team is going to a) burn an OA card on him, and b) take away a fourth line development spot from their youth, to play him?
He would probably make a much bigger contribution to a junior A team that doesn't have an OA cap. Suggesting he will be playing junior A is not an attack on the player, it's just recognizing the situation for what it is.
3 seasons and I didn't say it was an attck, just like you, I have a different opinion. Opinion, that's all. Hopefully he can get to a NHL main camp again . Good luck to allHe's had 4 seasons and two different teams to prove he's more than a fourth line banger. Which team is going to a) burn an OA card on him, and b) take away a fourth line development spot from their youth, to play him?
He would probably make a much bigger contribution to a junior A team that doesn't have an OA cap. Suggesting he will be playing junior A is not an attack on the player, it's just recognizing the situation for what it is.
No attacks, respectful isn't a word I'd use to describe your opinions on many people on this site. Regardless, good luck to "your tem"society has lost it’s ability to respectfully disagree and be cordial about it. someone’s opinion on a player should t result in attacks or arrows,
Thank youHe's had 4 seasons and two different teams to prove he's more than a fourth line banger. Which team is going to a) burn an OA card on him, and b) take away a fourth line development spot from their youth, to play him?
He would probably make a much bigger contribution to a junior A team that doesn't have an OA cap. Suggesting he will be playing junior A is not an attack on the player, it's just recognizing the situation for what it is.
+1society has lost it’s ability to respectfully disagree and be cordial about it. someone’s opinion on a player should t result in attacks or arrows,
You don't think during the covid year there was any contact between these teams and these players? 4 years to make an impression.3 seasons
As much time as any other 04 has had to make an impact. The kid seems to be well liked and very strong off ice. Playing 3 years in the OHL isn’t a negative, it’s a hell of an accomplishmentYou don't think during the covid year there was any contact between these teams and these players? 4 years to make an impression.
I believe that works out to pick #42 if I'm not mistaken. Maybe a little later in the draft than I was hoping for but nice to get into the 2nd round. Price is about what I was anticipating.Attack aquire Londons 2nd rd pick this year for a 2nd and 4th.
It's a late wnd, early 3rd most other yearsI believe that works out to pick #42 if I'm not mistaken. Maybe a little later in the draft than I was hoping for but nice to get into the 2nd round. Price is about what I was anticipating.
Should have the Attack now at #7, #42, #51 and #62 in the first three rounds come Friday.
Credit where it's due. I think everybody new they needed to find a way into the 2nd round and they made it happen. Holding the 2025 2nd rounder is a nice piece of business too.
The 7 pick should yield a franchise type player.The conversation has clearly moved to Friday's OHL draft. Just curious if anybody has a favorite or an opinion on who the Attack take at #7? In reading the mocks and draft chatter around the boards it seems to be forward heavy at the top end of the draft where Owen Sound picks and given our grads at forward this season it makes sense to grad a forward in my opinion. I'm thinking they go with a forward with 3 of the 4 picks on Friday night, using the other on a D. Goaltending is already solidified with George and Koprowski so they can take a goalie on day 2 of the draft.
My personal favorite based on what I've read and player fit with how DeGray likes to draft is Parker Vaughan. Listed at 6'1" and 175lbs. Considers himself a power forward. It would fit with the way they drafted the 2007 class in the early rounds. Also wears the captain "C" on his jersey. Looks like a good fit to me.
I don't think it's so much about not a lot of teams holding multiple 2nds vs the teams with multiple 2nds having early 2nd round picks that would have come with likely too steep a price. Those picks would have been top 30 picks vs #42 coming from London in the Oshawa trade. I think you're right, it's likely more of a 3rd rounder in value vs that of a true 2nd rounder. Still, at the end of the day, they have 4 picks on Friday which is mission accomplished in my mind. #7 is the key piece Friday and should get opportunity next year to earn/play a meaningful role off the bat based on so many key grads off the Attack roster. Really important to hit at #7. Pick #42, #51 and #62 are a little removed from the top end pieces so can't afford to miss at #7 in my opinion. Getting quality 16 year old adds with the later picks is a bonus. Development of those pieces is the big thing for me.It's a late wnd, early 3rd most other years
There wasn't a lot of teams holding multiple 2nds, so yes a decent move.
We should get a marquee guy at 7
The 7 pick should yield a franchise type player.
1-3 FridayHow many rounds go friday?
Development of those pieces is the big thing for me. Thats a key statement. We need a coach that can develop the kids instead of having them sit in the stands most of the yearI don't think it's so much about not a lot of teams holding multiple 2nds vs the teams with multiple 2nds having early 2nd round picks that would have come with likely too steep a price. Those picks would have been top 30 picks vs #42 coming from London in the Oshawa trade. I think you're right, it's likely more of a 3rd rounder in value vs that of a true 2nd rounder. Still, at the end of the day, they have 4 picks on Friday which is mission accomplished in my mind. #7 is the key piece Friday and should get opportunity next year to earn/play a meaningful role off the bat based on so many key grads off the Attack roster. Really important to hit at #7. Pick #42, #51 and #62 are a little removed from the top end pieces so can't afford to miss at #7 in my opinion. Getting quality 16 year old adds with the later picks is a bonus. Development of those pieces is the big thing for me.