Nathaniel
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2013
- 13,637
- 6,255
Decent level of interest yes but if it did show that having kids directly lessened one's athletic output that'd just be unnecessary fuel for anti-natalists.it never gets talked about, but it would be interesting if there was a study on the all time greats, when they became dads, and the places in their careers where they slip to a lower level, big or small.
Some people just don't want kids, nothing sad about that.Jagr is a sad case for sure
And I'm sure it's Mike Babcock's fault, somehow.Mike Commodore, the rockstar himself, also no kids.
This would be a really interesting NBA thread...right?It's fine for a thread.
If you aren't interested, you aren't required to participate.
This would be a really interesting NBA thread...right?
Could be worse my boss is an open Leafs fan, he gets ribbed every spring.Hey, if I could reasonably determine what was objectively interesting, I probably wouldn’t be a Kraken fan.
I'm 39 and never married, no kids.
Every relationship I've been in I became miserable and not myself.
I can live my life the way it seems fit, no outside interference.