Foppa_Rules
Registered User
smoothskater said:Who has more potential? Ovechkin or Crosby? I for one dont know yet.
That's great. Why did you try to bring Crosby into the conversation?
smoothskater said:Who has more potential? Ovechkin or Crosby? I for one dont know yet.
Predatore said:What is Lecavalier's potential and what is Oveckin's potential?
H/H said:Just like people are saying he's the "real deal" without having proven anything.
Rabid Ranger said:I'm not trying to prove anything, since it's a little premature to suggest what kind of career Ovechkin will have. IMO though, he is not the end all many are claiming to be.
Wow you're not too bright are you? I showed you 1 + 1 = 2 and you still couldn't understand. How sad.Foppa_Rules said:Don't try to make me responsible for the posts of other Russian fans. They are entitled to their opinions, but don't try to merge my opinions with theirs and draw outlandish conclusions from your unscientific attemps to argue your point.
Potential? Sure. Ovechkin's limit is the sky. One of the best prospects in decades and looks to have better tools than Lecavalier, but to say with conviction that Ovy is better than Vinny when he hasn't proven anything yet is simply biased and illogical considereing wilka91 earlier told people to wait at least 40 regular season games.smoothskater said:Agreed.
But I really think that Ovechkin has more potential than Vinny. Dont you think?
Canuck21t said:Wow you're not too bright are you? I showed you 1 + 1 = 2 and you still couldn't understand. How sad.
No, I tried to show you that you took 2 posts out of their context. Do you know what out of context means? The 2 posts you replied to were replies to wilka91's post but you simply ignored that. Holly cow, it's amazing how someone can be so dumb.Foppa_Rules said:You took a comment of mine, smushed it together with a comment of someone else's, and tried to make me responsible for your conclusion. In reality you tried to tell me 1 + 4 = 9, and are completely shocked that I won't believe you.