HF Habs: Out Of Town Thread: 2026 Play-off edition

[Boss Man Hughes]

So are Vegas.

True. But if the league won't ban guys like hart and Quennville for life someone will sign them

 

[Boss Man Hughes]

Nah, they've been a pretty clean team overall, aside from the hits on Hutson.

Nonsense. They win because they get away with interference and holding.

 

[LaP]

Carolina got multiple gifts from the NHL that game

Its been a dud of a playoffs and they know it

If you are talking about the goal it was absolutely not a good goal. Gallagher got a similar goal waived off while the play was still live couple of years ago.

 

[TRG]

Nonsense. They win because they get away with interference and holding.

Tampa got away with it, Buffalo got away with it. It's not a Canes issue, it's a league-wide refereeing issue.

 

[LaP]

Nonsense. They win because they get away with interference and holding.

The league did help Vegas every opportunity they got in the last couple of years. I spit on both team but i spit on Micro fracture cap circumvention strong man the most.

 

[TRG]

No. I asked but I assume it was a dive because they know Bettman has the fix in and they will always get a call

Listen, pick up the phone, call Bonsoir les sportifs and share your conspiracies there, and spare us your BS.

 

[MarkovsKnee]

Who has been worse Slavin or Anderson?

Slavin was terrible tonight. Andersen was just meh, but Hart isn't great either.

 

[Apoplectic Habs Fan]

If you are talking about the goal it was absolutely not a good goal. Gallagher got a similar goal waived off while the play was still live couple of years ago.

Gallagher has had like a 100 for no reason so thats meaningless

puck was loose imo and Andersen didnt even have his glove in a proper position to say he had it covered

 

[Whitesnake]

You guys just didn't get it? I'M responsible for Canes comeback? When I threatened them that if they wouldn't win, they'd get KK back in the lineup...you didn't see that?

 

[Whitesnake]

If you are talking about the goal it was absolutely not a good goal. Gallagher got a similar goal waived off while the play was still live couple of years ago.

to me it's a good goal. The puck was IN SIGHT. Clearly.

 

[LaP]

to me it's a good goal. The puck was IN SIGHT. Clearly.

Watched the replay multiple times could not see clearly the puck once when it was under the goalie when the player pushed the goalie with his stick.

 

[LaP]

Gallagher has had like a 100 for no reason so thats meaningless

puck was loose imo and Andersen didnt even have his glove in a proper position to say he had it covered

You can't push a goalie unless you see the puck. Call on the ice is no goal so if you dont see the puck on the replay call on the ice stands. He clearly moves the goalie by shoveling his stick under him.