Tuna99
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2009
- 15,471
- 7,441
Ott: RNH, Puljarvii
Edm: Tierney, Abramov, Gustavson, 2nd 2020
Edm: Tierney, Abramov, Gustavson, 2nd 2020
If he's waiver eligible, we have first dibs. Why trade anything for him?
YesterdayThe ask was a 2/3 liner for Puju. Tierney fits that bill perfectly. Would you trade him Puju straight up or would you include a pick as well.
He is a better player and prospect than Logam Brown.
If Edm had left him in the AHL instead of rushing him into the lineup he would likely be seen much more favourably.Well that's certainly an interesting take for sure.
The ask was a 2/3 liner for Puju. Tierney fits that bill perfectly. Would you trade him Puju straight up or would you include a pick as well.
I think Edmonton have receive better offer than Boedkerthey should be adding not us, tierney has hit 40+ in his last 2 seasons, people can say what they want but 0.5 ppg is about a 2nd liners production and paying that for an unknown that took a step back is too much
that being said poolparty is still young and still has the time and capability to hit that potential
i would do boedker retained (50%) for poolparty
as long as poolparty is willing to sign for less than 1.5 million we would be saving money and edmonton picks up more of a sure thing in boedker as a third liner.
I think Edmonton have receive better offer than Boedker
Yeah the second sharks of next year or the second of Dallas this year + Paul but I think Edmonton have better offer and Pulju he is a player I think turn very good with another teamoh i wouldnt be surprised, but thats about the most i would be comfortable giving up for him if we are talking players on the sens right now
especially since tierney is a center and if he produces like that again im sure we will either get a high draft pick offer or more of a sure thing at the deadline if we go that route
picks wise i would do the sharks second next year at most and even that i am iffy on
Giving Pulj away for nothing is a better option than Boedker.I think Edmonton have receive better offer than Boedker
I thought it was reported they may be looking for a third line player. Guess they didn’t want smith so we took anisimov instead?If we could get Puljujarvi for a 3rd, I imagine that trade would have already been completed.
they should be adding not us, tierney has hit 40+ in his last 2 seasons, people can say what they want but 0.5 ppg is about a 2nd liners production and paying that for an unknown that took a step back is too much
that being said poolparty is still young and still has the time and capability to hit that potential
i would do boedker retained (50%) for poolparty
as long as poolparty is willing to sign for less than 1.5 million we would be saving money and edmonton picks up more of a sure thing in boedker as a third liner.
Puljujarvi has played 53 AHL games and has scored 37 points a .7 ppg.
Brown has played 56 AHL games and has 42 points a .75 ppg.
If Edm had left him in the AHL instead of rushing him into the lineup he would likely be seen much more favourably.
I prefer Brown but Puljujarvi has had his reputation damaged by being rushed imo.
Puljujarvi just came off double-hernia surgery. Brown has not.
I know you know this. I'm just pointing it out to anyone else reading your post.
Obviously can't trade for him until Edm signs him and pays a giant signing bonus first...
Why would we give up Gustavsson?Ott: RNH, Puljarvii
Edm: Tierney, Abramov, Gustavson, 2nd 2020