The BCHL will keep going, but it will be a shadow of what they envisioned it to be. Basically it will be glorified Midget AAA, and a place for guys who may have fallen through the cracks to try to get noticed. In the past there were a not insignificant number of kids who got drafted straight out of the BCHL to the NHL - those days are gone. In their defence, though, every other Junior A league in the country will be in the same position. Given the current situation the BCHL and Hockey Canada would be well advised to kiss and make up - it would be best for both parties.
As for White and Providence College, the problem is that those NCAA programs love to whisper sweet nothings in the ear of their recruits - "Hey, there are plenty of opportunities to play early here, blah blah blah." The problem is that every top shelf NCAA hockey program carries a huge roster, with a number of Black Aces who only practice and never dress for a game all year. (When I saw a game at St. Lawrence last year, I think I counted 27 on their roster.) There is a huge risk that he becomes one of those. IIRC Tyler Boucher wasn't getting a ton of ice at his NCAA school, which is why he packed up and came back to Ottawa.
As for our squad I'll say this - at least these kids haven't quit on Dave Cameron. They are showing some fight lately, which is positive. Cameron takes a lot of grief around here but I save most of my criticism for Boyd and the series of poor decisions he has made over the last couple of seasons. Combine that with some mediocre drafts and you have what you have. The ghost of Toe Blake would have a tough time squeezing much out of the roster Cameron has currently been given, and I'm not sure next season looks a whole lot better. The 67's absolutely have to improve their drafting, and desperately need to find a diamond in the rough in the later rounds if they want to improve. The series of underperforming high picks and import players have absolutely crippled the roster.
Let’s look at Boyd…
Drafting:
The ‘07 group is very deep. We have twelve signed players with eleven of them playing games (Whitehead is the 12th but injury has kept him off the ice so far). Of those twelve, five are relatively important players - Whitehead, Ekberg, Dietsch, Nelson, and Jackson. Kingwell, Yanni, and Houben will likely be regulars next year. We aren’t sure about Conway, White, Avila, and Bowes. What we do know is we have a lot of mid sized LW ‘07s so there isn’t room for all of them! But, for a team to have twelve in one age group that mostly look half decent, it is pretty good, if not anything special.
The ‘06 group is the leadership group next year. That group is thinner than thin. Four players - Korbler, Brady, Kelly, and Marrelli. Horrid draft. We lacked centres and Boyd passed on Beaudoin (a big Ottawa area centre rated very high) for a converted forward D-Man (Mews). Shocking really. That pick changed the trajectory of this team dramatically and it wasn’t’ for the better. That pick truly put a stamp on how this team selects players. If you want to boil down all the problems at the draft table lately, you can point at that one single pick and understand where the issue lies.
No one can truly criticize me for revisionist history either. I was following that draft pick by pick because there were a few centres available that may slide to Ottawa. Clearly Misa wasn’t going to drop to Ottawa and we were pretty certain Villeneuve wouldn’t drop to Ottawa but there was a good chance Van Volsen and Beaudoin would be available to Ottawa at #7. Ottawa tends to lean local when possible so if not Villeneuve, you’d think they’d go with Beaudoin. We had ZERO centres returning that season so we needed to land on a centre. Nope. D-Man + D-Man with the two 1st round picks.
Four key players over two seasons decide that the 67’s organization isn’t where they want to play. This is an organization that provides the players with EVERYTHING off ice. Yet, four key players (Rohrer, Beck, Gardiner, and Mews) decide, “Nah. I’m out!” How is that possible? Is it an anomaly? This is something that truly needs attention by senior leadership in OSEG.
Trades:
This is another area we have discussed at length. Making a half hearted run two years in a row (2022-23 and 2023-24) after getting out managed in 2019 by Burnett isn’t acceptable at this point. This team should have two Championships (2019 and 2023). Letting Burnett pilfer Owen Sound for Suzuki and Durzi, basically at the 12th hour of the deadline for peanuts and not swooping in with a better offer is inexcusable. Tolnai plus a 2nd, 3rd, and 4th would have gotten that deal done with zero issues. That deal wins Ottawa a Championship in 2019 hands down.
Then in 2023, he held on to Mews and didn’t use him for Shane Wright. If you are going to dump 18 draft picks into Morrison and Mintyukov, what the hell are you doing not moving Mews or Marrelli for Shane Wright? Out in the 2nd round to the eventual Champions and then the following year, with zero centres ont he roster, you acquire two at the deadline but stop short of getting that last piece AGAIN for the 3rd time. Out in round 2 again. Keep in mind, had Boyd done what he needed to do in 2022-23 by trading Mews for Wright, we wouldn’t have been in position to make a run in 2023-24 which means we wouldn’t hav likely retooled a bit. With what the Petes managed to get for their players, I can only imagine what Ottawa would have gotten Stonehouse, and Mayich as 19 year olds at that deadline.
That brings us to this year. I know a lot has been said about Pinelli wanting to stay etc. but IMO, this was about communication. It is incumbent on the GM to communicate the plan with a player like Pinelli. That allows the player to come to grips with the fact that the team is selling and there is zero sense for him to stay under any circumstances. There should never have even been a situation where Pinelli chooses to stay in Ottawa. Ever. Then it comes down to Boyd gauging the market and communicating that market to Pinelli. If Kitchener was never really interested then so be it. If Griffin wouldn’t waive to come to Ottawa then so be it but these details needed to be communicated a week before the deadline. I’m fine with allowing the player to pick the destination but it has to be the destination that is available. Oshawa #1 of the available? Fine. Griffin won’t waive? Fine. Next is Barrie or Brantford. Pick one. Both were apparently available. This boils down to communication. The GM needs to paint the picture to the point the player feels they have no real choice. In other words, if you don’t go, you will be surrounded by nothing and will be at best a 50-50 shot of even making the playoffs. Communicate it and be blunt about it.
On top of that, I am reasonably certain that the cuts would have been deeper had the Pinelli deal gone through. I think they felt they didn’t have a choice with Mews but when Pinelli wasn’t moved, they shifted focus on at least trying to make the playoffs. They kept all of Foster, Mayich, and Dever. Another bad decision. AND, to top it all off, let’s assume I am wrong about by assumptions of the deadline. That means it is even worse! We have a GM that couldn’t read the landscape in front of his own eyes and approached it as if he had options.
So, that is all the negatives surrounding Boyd that I can come up with. There are positives as well but this comes down to what the OSEG instructions are. Is Boyd somewhat handcuffed? Does he have shackles on his ankles that prevent him from doing what we feel is the better course of action? Possible. I don’t know. This is why I cannot say for certain that Boyd needs to go. However, if he is shackled and he knows he is being shackled, why would he stay? If he left Ottawa, he’d get snapped up somewhere else for sure. This is why I lean towards him being the one that makes the decisions with relative autonomy.