Fastpace
The Devil's Advocate in Person
The 67's clearly beat London in the 3rd, 3–2 with a 12-5 shots advantage. It doesn't matter losing by 7 or by 1, always look for something positive to work with from a loss. Ottawa won the third period
Disagree he's much better behind the net.I don’t remember the last time I saw a pulled goalie get put back in. Holy smokes put Mews in net at this point
London stopped shooting after the second until the penalty shot and their power play, plus it was the scrubs on the ice. Let's not fool ourselves. It was a 60 minute lesson on how to play hockey. They would be best to accept it and learn.The 67's clearly beat London in the 3rd, 3–2 with a 12-5 shots advantage. It doesn't matter losing by 7 or by 1, always look for something positive to work with from a loss. Ottawa won the third period
Why Nelson ? Was he the only soul on the ice getting beaten? What were all his teammates doing on the ice? Win as a team and lose as a team, that including all rookies on the teamSome "positives" from todays' game (London "practice?)
- It's clear Nelson is not ready for prime time. He's good very often but not enough for a starting role yet
- Conway is even less ready, if ever
- London is 24-3. We are 11-10 or so. That's us- we are mediocre. There's no point in buying this trade window. Let's move on to the rebuild.
No but he is the goalie. @frontsfan67 will back me up on this playing a hungry London game with a tookie in nets isnever a good idea. That is a Caputi move.Why Nelson ? Was he the only soul on the ice getting beaten? What were all his teammates doing on the ice? Win as a team and lose as a team, that including all rookies on the team
@sirius67fan I take it you were not around for the Peter Lee year. Hell even the starting goalie wanted to leave a couple of games.Disagree he's much better behind the net.
First time ever I left the game after 2, just couldn't watch it anymore.
No but he is the goalie. @frontsfan67 will back me up on this playing a hungry London game with a tookie in nets isnever a good idea. That is a Caputi move.
London comes into every game humgry and looking to improve stats. Humter coaches by his name his team is always hunting and looking for prey (mistakes)
Playing Nelson and not saying he was in for an injury now to me makes it official that we have 3 goalies on the team.
Now we have an issue to tdeal with.
You cannot blame Nelson for the game. He is a rookie and rookies have bad games and get beaten. Hel even allstar goalies have games like that (Roy Montreal)
The question though to me is are you willilng to take up a position in goal when you could be better used with a forward or another defenceman.
Obviously 3 of our 4 OA are in a bind. I think Gerrrior and Stonehouse played yeasterday to give more strength to the forward lines. OOPS
Having 3 goaliles though makes you wonder what the plan is.
I know I have said this and got shot down but I have to think the sooner Boyd decides what he is doing and pulls the plug the better.
Brady has been back long enough that if there were any teams interested he would know by now.
No one at this stage (except maybe Brampton} needs a back up goalie
@sirius67fan I take it you were not around for the Peter Lee year. Hell even the starting goalie wanted to leave a couple of games.
@OMG67 I have to think after this weekend where we had trouble beatin the Petes and then get blownout Boyd has to see that this is a rebuild so forget about buying anything except maybe a couple of hockey sticks or Christmas presents for the family and look at this and next year as rebuilding years.
To me the optimum at this point woud be
1. resolve the Mews situation if it still exists or if you think he willnot be back next year I E ask for a trade
2. trade Pinelil and see if youban get a 16 year old and some picks.
3. release MacK not my first choice to do would rather trde Stonehouse BUT we can not carry 3 goalies all year like we are. Now that Conway has had his cherry busted he needs to get in games where he actually has a chance. If for nothing more that the give him back some of the confidence that he lost (again @frontsfan67) will explain if you need it
4. They need to have a long sit down with DC and ensure that he is willing to go with the young guys and develop them properly. If not the ownership needs to step in.
It's a 20 men team game, and that includes your least skilled players, all rookies, top players and everything in between. They lose together, and they win together, only the team is at fault or has the credit for wins. Each member on this team have a role to play, do it well, they win, fail, they lose. You just don't go bringing up a rookie player into a social media page and publically point him out as the player to blame for a 20-man team loss. Use a private page and invite your friends to the discussion, publically embarrassing a player in public for him to read it all, can be very dangerous. (In my humble opinion)No but he is the goalie. @frontsfan67 will back me up on this playing a hungry London game with a tookie in nets isnever a good idea. That is a Caputi move.
London comes into every game humgry and looking to improve stats. Humter coaches by his name his team is always hunting and looking for prey (mistakes)
Playing Nelson and not saying he was in for an injury now to me makes it official that we have 3 goalies on the team.
Now we have an issue to tdeal with.
You cannot blame Nelson for the game. He is a rookie and rookies have bad games and get beaten. Hel even allstar goalies have games like that (Roy Montreal)
The question though to me is are you willilng to take up a position in goal when you could be better used with a forward or another defenceman.
Obviously 3 of our 4 OA are in a bind. I think Gerrrior and Stonehouse played yeasterday to give more strength to the forward lines. OOPS
Having 3 goaliles though makes you wonder what the plan is.
I know I have said this and got shot down but I have to think the sooner Boyd decides what he is doing and pulls the plug the better.
Brady has been back long enough that if there were any teams interested he would know by now.
No one at this stage (except maybe Brampton} needs a back up goalie
@sirius67fan I take it you were not around for the Peter Lee year. Hell even the starting goalie wanted to leave a couple of games.
@OMG67 I have to think after this weekend where we had trouble beatin the Petes and then get blownout Boyd has to see that this is a rebuild so forget about buying anything except maybe a couple of hockey sticks or Christmas presents for the family and look at this and next year as rebuilding years.
To me the optimum at this point woud be
1. resolve the Mews situation if it still exists or if you think he willnot be back next year I E ask for a trade
2. trade Pinelil and see if youban get a 16 year old and some picks.
3. release MacK not my first choice to do would rather trde Stonehouse BUT we can not carry 3 goalies all year like we are. Now that Conway has had his cherry busted he needs to get in games where he actually has a chance. If for nothing more that the give him back some of the confidence that he lost (again @frontsfan67) will explain if you need it
4. They need to have a long sit down with DC and ensure that he is willing to go with the young guys and develop them properly. If not the ownership needs to step in.
Conway is not the #3. Conway is the signed BUG. It prevents us from having to rotate in Back up goalies like we did last year. There is no intention of him being anything other than the designated #3 goalie. That may change in the future but as of now, he has done nothing either in the OHL or prior to the OHL that suggests otherwise.
If MAcK is traded/released, they will go and get an acceptable experienced backup. PErsonally, I am with you. Trade Stonehouse. Keep MacK. But, if they trade Pinelli, keeping the forward may make more sense. IT is not like Nelson has been consistently poor. He’s been solid for a young rookie and I won’t’ write off his season based on this one game.
I thought that the only way a BUG could play was if there was an injury. That obviously was not thecase. Does that not change his status. Also could we not be better served by having just 2 goalies and using the other line up spot for a rookie or a player that can play forward or defence.
Conway is not the #3. Conway is the signed BUG. It prevents us from having to rotate in Back up goalies like we did last year. There is no intention of him being anything other than the designated #3 goalie. That may change in the future but as of now, he has done nothing either in the OHL or prior to the OHL that suggests otherwise.
If MAcK is traded/released, they will go and get an acceptable experienced backup. PErsonally, I am with you. Trade Stonehouse. Keep MacK. But, if they trade Pinelli, keeping the forward may make more sense. IT is not like Nelson has been consistently poor. He’s been solid for a young rookie and I won’t’ write off his season based on this one game.
I thought that the only way a BUG could play was if there was an injury. That obviously was not thecase. Does that not change his status. Also could we not be better served by having just 2 goalies and using the other line up spot for a rookie or a player that can play forward or defence.
Conway is not the #3. Conway is the signed BUG. It prevents us from having to rotate in Back up goalies like we did last year. There is no intention of him being anything other than the designated #3 goalie. That may change in the future but as of now, he has done nothing either in the OHL or prior to the OHL that suggests otherwise.
If MAcK is traded/released, they will go and get an acceptable experienced backup. PErsonally, I am with you. Trade Stonehouse. Keep MacK. But, if they trade Pinelli, keeping the forward may make more sense. IT is not like Nelson has been consistently poor. He’s been solid for a young rookie and I won’t’ write off his season based on this one game.
I thought that the only way a BUG could play was if there was an injury. That obviously was not thecase. Does that not change his status. Also could we not be better served by having just 2 goalies and using the other line up spot for a rookie or a player that can play forward or defence.
I think you need to reread what I wroteIt's a 20 men team game, and that includes your least skilled players, all rookies, top players and everything in between. They lose together, and they win together, only the team is at fault or has the credit for wins. Each member on this team have a role to play, do it well, they win, fail, they lose. You just don't go bringing up a rookie player into a social media page and publically point him out as the player to blame for a 20-man team loss. Use a private page and invite your friends to the discussion, publically embarrassing a player in public for him to read it all, can be very dangerous. (In my humble opinion)