Well the performance vs. Kingston this year is odd and I don't have an explanation for it other than its a unfavourable matchup for the 67s.
But, I'm a glass half full kind of guy (most times) and weigh the Kingston games vs. the post-deadline Kitchener games (1-1, but outplayed them both times), the Saginaw game on the back end of a 3-in-3 road trip in which we carried a lead into the final minutes, and the other games since the deadline in which we outplayed teams and carried leads into the final minutes/seconds.
Yes, the team has had difficulty holding leads and has given away points to teams they're chasing in the standings. The 67s also have a tendency to "play down" to the opposition, like the recent Niagara and Sarnia games. The 67s aren't what I would consider to be a great team. They're a good team, maybe a very good team with MacKenzie and can just as easily do some damage in the playoffs (which I consider to be an eastern conference final berth) as get knocked out in the first round by, say, Oshawa. We'll have to wait and see.
Maillet hasn't been great. I do think he can play at the pace that Cameron wants to see though, unlike Lawrence. All things considered I'd do that trade again. Better yet, perhaps Boyd should have targeted Peer (maybe he did). Stonehouse has shown some signs of finding his game, but he's been inconsistent. One step forward, two steps back. One good game, two bad ones. Gardiner has looked a little lost recently admittedly, most problematic on the defensive side.
On the plus side, the team is much better at clearing the zone and crisply executing breakouts. That was a pet peeve of mine last year. The maturation of Marrelli and Mews has helped in that regard. The 67s are a really good possession team in fact. Scoring ability isn't what I would consider to be a plus for this team and that has hurt them recently.