sitting fayne doesnt really affect the chemistry of the team. Thats just reaching.
I still dont think lou is done. Someones gonna go.
I thought re-signing Sal was fine but not at the length and of it's +35. He's 37 already.
and while we're debating small vs big pads, I think Tommy Soderstrom gets the record for smallest pads by a goalie playing during Brodeur's career.
Sal got his deal because of his magical goals from last year in the playoffs. They don't expect him to put up 20/20 but I bet Lou was hoping he could chip in randomly.
Currently, both of them can barely hold the zone.
It does something. We played our best games defensively when Fayne came back and Larsson was inserted into the line up for the Tally-wacker. They shut Pitt and Malkin down, they limited and shut down Tampa/Stamkos, and they kept the Rags quiet too. They played really bad 1st period against Philly, but shut the door when they needed too. It wasn't all Moose and Marty in those games. Fact is there is a pretty big drop in performance when you sub Tally for Fayne. I don't know if its because Fayne is great, Tally is terrible, a mix of the two, or Tally being in over Fayne throws the pairings out of wack.
Funny thing is the D really wasn't THAT bad yesterday.
No he didn't, everyone and their grandmother knew that was a fluke, just like Jay Pandolfo's six-goal postseason in '03. Personally, I think he got that contract for off-ice reasons, not on-ice ones.
No he didn't, everyone and their grandmother knew that was a fluke, just like Jay Pandolfo's six-goal postseason in '03. Personally, I think he got that contract for off-ice reasons, not on-ice ones.
It was really nothing special against a depleted squad. The sequence where Alfie was left all alone too. Nice one. If it was Pittsburgh we would have been down by a lot. Consider the fact it was a depleted team, and yeah the D wasn't great.The D kinda was bad yesterday, despite the one goal. Ottawa had a ton of chances and no luck on a couple. No it wasn't another five goal game but it certainly wasn't the Pittsburgh masterpieces either.
I thought re-signing Sal was fine but not at the length and of it's +35. He's 37 already.
No he didn't, everyone and their grandmother knew that was a fluke, just like Jay Pandolfo's six-goal postseason in '03. Personally, I think he got that contract for off-ice reasons, not on-ice ones. It made no earthly sense to bring him back otherwise with the glut on D.
I still have this theory that Lou wants this team to be a defensive team. Not that he wants Pete to change his system, but he loves the identity of the Devils and defense first. So with that keeping all these defensemen helps keep that spirit alive. Call me crazy, but I've been getting that feeling for a while now.
He got a 3 year deal because they knew he was a fluke? You don't sign someone to be your captain, which is essentially what you said. If lou did that then that was a terrible mistake and I don't know if Lou would make that level of one.
Lou wants us to be solid defensively , no doubt. But, first he wants us to win. Whatever gets that done, Lou will take it
I still have this theory that Lou wants this team to be a defensive team. Not that he wants Pete to change his system, but he loves the identity of the Devils and defense first. So with that keeping all these defensemen helps keep that spirit alive. Call me crazy, but I've been getting that feeling for a while now.
Fayne out doesn't make the team unable to execute the team system correctly, I know Mark's better than Tallinder but not by Nicklas Lidstrom to Jack Johnson margin. Let's not go too far, It's more of a coincidence.
Signing him to be a leader is infinitely smarter than signing him expecting new and improved offense from a 36-year old with eight points last regular season.