Nerf27
Registered User
- Oct 15, 2012
- 642
- 289
It’s quite hilarious. Did they play well? No not at all. But ya. I’ll leave it at that.Now I remember why all the intelligent people left this board. Back to X I go.
It’s quite hilarious. Did they play well? No not at all. But ya. I’ll leave it at that.Now I remember why all the intelligent people left this board. Back to X I go.
It's baffling lol like no one is saying Oshawa should've won by any means cause they didn't play great but what is glaringly obvious is that Oshawa’s chance at winning was taken away from themIt’s quite hilarious. Did they play well? No not at all. But ya. I’ll leave it at that.
No one cares. Your bias clouds your judgement. The still shot does nothing to change the adjudication just as no pick would have done nothing to change the outcome.Now I remember why all the intelligent people left this board. Back to X I go.
Your name says it all.No one cares. Your bias clouds your judgement. The still shot does nothing to change the adjudication just as no pick would have done nothing to change the outcome.
Definitely don’t pick Lindstrom I’ll tell ya that much- may be injury prone already at 18. Assuming it’s from this past draft the only 2 I’d pick over Sennecke are Celebrini and DemidovHey guys looking for some input on what to expect from Beckett Sennecke as an NHL player. Is he a first line player or a bottom six player? 40 points or 80 points? I haven’t seen him play except for hi lites.
My fantasy league has our prospects draft next weekend and I have pick 2 so trying to decide between Demidov Lidstrom or Sennecke.