piqued
nos merentur hoc
- Nov 22, 2006
- 33,062
- 4,102
Swap Duchene for Benn and Harley for Miro.Got to find a way to get Duchene on the top unit. The whole seniority thing needs to go out the window. Get your best players together and figure it out before the playoffs. Between Duchene and Hintz they can manage winning a faceoff.
Ah, it's my favorite thread.
Still waiting on putting Duchene on the top unit. And Harley to top unit. Any day now.
It won't show as a PP goal, but the lone goal yesterday was from.... you guessed it... Harley getting the point shot through the first layer of PKer.
Also we could talk about how we have possibly the deepest forward group in our salary cap era yet somehow have arguably 3 forwards taking shifts on the powerplay who shouldn't be there at all (Dadonov, Marchment, Benn)
The problem goes beyond Xs and Os -- it's a fundamental misunderstanding of how to build units in the first place, coupled with a slavish dedication to giving veterans and players with seniority all of the looks.
It's not like the PP has been bad or anything. During the entire time DeBoer has been coach, the Stars have the 6th best regular season PP and 5th best playoff PP. The PP has been good in every playoff series but the one against the Oilers in the conference finals where they shockingly scored zero PP goals. The other five series saw PP percentages ranging from 23.5% to 37.%.Now down to 16% and 25th in the league.
I think my bigger problem beyond personnel and tactics is the level of importance the Stars seem place on the powerplay. It's treated as a "nice to have" component of their overall game rather than an absolute essential, which it should be. Oh golly gee we'll get it figured out with a few more practices.
The org seems to think they can 5-on-5 their way to a Cup when the cold hard reality of the modern game is that results are decided on special teams and even strength becomes a glorified time-kill during the playoffs in between powerplays.
The most important things your team can do:
1) score on the PP
2) draw penalties
3) kill penalties
........
4) roll 4 lines at even strength <---- we are here
I remember watching Pete D's Sharks years ago and thinking the same thing about their PP then. If the point shot doesn't work then they were very ineffective. He's always been a one trick pony relying on point/deflections in this regard.It's not like the PP has been bad or anything. During the entire time DeBoer has been coach, the Stars have the 6th best regular season PP and 5th best playoff PP. The PP has been good in every playoff series but the one against the Oilers in the conference finals where they shockingly scored zero PP goals. The other five series saw PP percentages ranging from 23.5% to 37.%.
But there is something about the way the PP tries to generate scoring chances when in a slump. My view is Pavelski's deflection magic has created a problem for the team because they so often default to lobbing wristers from the point as their primary means of PP attack all because they have had a lot of great goals come from Pavelski, Benn, Hintz, and Johnston deflecting pucks. The top guys not scoring seems to have sapped a lot of their confidence to generate the types of down low scoring chances that are most effective and are defaulting to a perimeter game with lame shots form distance.
He will never be fired as long as DeBoer is the coach.Get this piece of shit pp coach far away from this team. Loser
Best time to fire DeBoer was last spring before he coached this team out of a Cup win with his terrible handling of the defense (along with Spott's awful PP). Berube's Leafs are playing better than they are, he definitely would have got us at least to the Final.He will never be fired as long as DeBoer is the coach.
Well that's embarrassing. That should be some indication that it's time to move on from DeBoer, like every team out there has done.Stars are down to 30th in Net PP% which factors in shorthanded goals allowed.
Down there with Boston, St Louis, and NYI
Not sure Bork is the answer. Dude looks like Nic Petan 2.0 to meGive me a PP unit with Bourque please
Won't happen without some injuries it seems no matter what at this point
You can't really think DeBoer's coaching cost the Stars a Cup, can you? DeBoer didn't cause Pavelski to lose his mojo or Tanev to get hurt.Best time to fire DeBoer was last spring before he coached this team out of a Cup win with his terrible handling of the defense (along with Spott's awful PP). Berube's Leafs are playing better than they are, he definitely would have got us at least to the Final.
Second best time to fire DeBoer is yesterday, third best time is right now. Sadly, Nill isn't the kind of GM to pull the trigger.
AgreeNot sure Bork is the answer. Dude looks like Nic Petan 2.0 to me
Sure I can, Vegas couldn't get a Cup until they fired him, then they immediately got one.You can't really think DeBoer's coaching cost the Stars a Cup, can you? DeBoer didn't cause Pavelski to lose his mojo or Tanev to get hurt.
I think this coaching staff puts too much value on practice. They've used that as an excuse a few times about why the PP personnel doesn't change.Accepted wisdom across the league is that you give the PP chances to your best/veteran players. When the vets aren't producing, do you fire the PP coach or swap out the vets?