Novacain
Registered User
- Feb 24, 2012
- 4,367
- 4,895
Really puts Backes into perspective. Here he was, our captain for years, and although we were good, we were never able to take that next step. Put him on a perennial contender powerhouse (I guess you could argue we are/were too since 2012), and he's on the 4th line or a scratch.
This is a bad way of thinking about it. Backes makes tenure in Boston was basically the exact scenario that made the Blues not match the contract offer out of worry: He was big, not quick, physical force, and the track record of players like that succeeding into there 30’s is very very small. Backes was 32 when he signed with. Boston, was a productive but clearly over paid player in his first 2 years before the injuries just ate him alive. By 18-19 he was in his age 34 season and his body just wouldn’t let him be better then a 4th line talent anymore.
Its a tail as old as time, regarding power forwards in the NHL. Hell, Backes decline took a hell of a lot longer then Lucic, for instance.