Confirmed with Link: Oliver Wahlstrom Claimed by Bruins

Hookslide

Registered User
Nov 19, 2018
5,757
5,184
Every time that clip is played, Torts gets an unexplained, nasty creepy crawly feeling out of thin air.
Torts can get all pissy about it as well as Zegras clips, but in all honestly it is just for show and definitely hurts how they are looked as hockey players. Personally if I never see a OW clip again, I will be very happy man, the clips I want see of him a goal scoring game winner.
 

McGarnagle

Yes.
Aug 5, 2017
30,592
42,081

I've always wanted to know how these numbers are assigned to depth players and callups. Because they're kind of random but not all that random because there's a lot of recycling of 71s, 47s, 55s. Is the equipment manager the one choosing them and he just has a soft spot for certain numbers, or is it a thing where they say certain numbers are more legible to broadcasters and fans, etc. The latter is my theory since confusable round numbers like 89s and 65s haven't been seen in fifteen years.

If it were up to me and I were a callup I'd rather be the first #96 or #85 in Bruins team history than just another #71 or #43. Though I also can see from the management perspective that if you're just some part time replacement, you have to earn the honor of a unique number and by reassigning the same numbers you break them down like army recruits and get them in team-first mode (Lou Lamoriello famously took this to the extreme in NJ).

In the end I suppose it's a little of all of the above as to how they get these numbers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BMC

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
10,001
20,110
I've always wanted to know how these numbers are assigned to depth players and callups. Because they're kind of random but not all that random because there's a lot of recycling of 71s, 47s, 55s. Is the equipment manager the one choosing them and he just has a soft spot for certain numbers, or is it a thing where they say certain numbers are more legible to broadcasters and fans, etc. The latter is my theory since confusable round numbers like 89s and 65s haven't been seen in fifteen years.

If it were up to me and I were a callup I'd rather be the first #96 or #85 in Bruins team history than just another #71 or #43. Though I also can see from the management perspective that if you're just some part time replacement, you have to earn the honor of a unique number and by reassigning the same numbers you break them down like army recruits and get them in team-first mode (Lou Lamoriello famously took this to the extreme in NJ).

In the end I suppose it's a little of all of the above as to how they get these numbers.
The player chooses the number? This isn’t training camp.
 

McGarnagle

Yes.
Aug 5, 2017
30,592
42,081
The player chooses the number? This isn’t training camp.
I don't know about that for the injury replacement or picked off waivers kind of guys. Maybe they get a choice out of a few pre-selected ones presented to them, but you don't see Billy Sweezey getting called up for a short stint and choosing a prime real estate sort of number like #10 or #14. They wind up in the 60s or 70s which doesn't seem like something too attractive to choose if every unused number were available.

Also, fun fact I just noticed: No Bruins has worn #32 since Don Sweeney took over as GM. Last one was Nick Johnson in 13-14.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TCB and BMC

GordonHowe

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 21, 2005
17,714
19,366
Newton, MA.
I'm not against Wahlstrom or Lysell, but I think it's pretty ironic we talk about Lysell not being good enough to make the team in a Wahlstrom thread, a guy the Bruins hope that can help their offense, but was waived by a team that also struggles scoring.

True.

But Lou's teams, save Toronto, are always defense first, offense last clubs.

The Islander Way en general is, these days anyway, unfriendly to offensively gifted, defensively challenged young players like Whalstrom.

They aren't exactly known for developing offensive talent. You might even say they are suspicious of doing so.

Boston, by reputation if not reality, has always been considered a defensively strong team. Even so, they have being able or at least willing to incorporate young talent into their system and "philosophy."

This pickup is a no-brainer.

Low risk, petty cash for potential high return.

They should start him on the third line and see what happens.

You never know.
 

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
10,001
20,110
I don't know about that for the injury replacement or picked off waivers kind of guys. Maybe they get a choice out of a few pre-selected ones presented to them, but you don't see Billy Sweezey getting called up for a short stint and choosing a prime real estate sort of number like #10 or #14. They wind up in the 60s or 70s which doesn't seem like something too attractive to choose if every unused number were available.

Also, fun fact I just noticed: No Bruins has worn #32 since Don Sweeney took over as GM. Last one was Nick Johnson in 13-14.
Ian Mitchell wore 14. Riley Tufte wore 10. Player’s choice for sure.
 

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,424
11,810
I’m more than happy with this claim. He is easily an upgrade over McLaughlin,Johnson and probably Geekie and Brazzeau. He will have 20 by the end of the season.


I’m not sure where anyone gets the pouty thing from other than it fits the narrative.
He's absolutely not better than Geekie. I also think Brazeau is better too.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad