Average? What criteria do you base that assessment on?
Based on save percentage (using Quant Hockey as a source) he is
Current season - 54th of 74 goalies with any minutes played. Bottom 1/3 of league
2023-24 - 31st goalie out of 64 players
As for parsing this data based on only looking at #1 goalies, that is challenged as many teams run tandems and determining who is the true #1 is isn’t clear. If you do a secondary sort on minutes played maybe you can get a tighter look but i don’t think it elevates him much just from a visual look of the raw data. (i don’t have the tools to migrate the data into excel to do that additional sort).
But i don’t think he’s even average.
Skinner was 4th in the league in starts last season so those stats are comparing a bunch of guys that started less games a lot much less so it's hard to compare guys that don't share near the same workload. One of the guys, btw, who is has been considered a top NHL goalie for a while in Juuse Saros had a .906 Save Pct, compared to Skinner's .905 and that's without playing in front of an absolute dumpster fire of a team for the first portion of the season. Jake Oettinger's save pct. btw, same as Skinner's.
Skinner also nearly won the Calder the season before with a .913 save pct.
Yes, he's had a bad season like 11 games in but the bigger sample size illustrates that he's a #1 starter in the league albeit an average one. Tons of goalies are inconsistent in this league, it's a higher scoring league now.
I just think it's ridiculous to state that 50 goalies would be clear upgrades on Skinner. How can I even respond to a post that crazy?
I'm not saying he's amazing or anything btw, I acknowledge that he has flaws and even called him a clown goalie on the 2nd goal in particular last night, but there's so much hyperbole around here in terms of how bad people say he is that it makes my head hurt.