The quote about MacTavish is like they put his name on the most successful thing in the organization to take the heat off him. He does a lot of scouting, both amateur and professional, and he's been down in Bakersfield before. But as far as "overseeing" the Condors, what does he do?
MacTavish could be a reason for some of the success the Condors have had. The problem is that our AHL team has been a failure for years, and MacTavish has been a part of that as well. Does one good year resolve him of that? Maybe Woodcroft is the main reason that group has had more success? Or maybe its just the fact that they have better players on the farm team than they have due to better scouting (doesnt mean it will translate to the NHL)?
Its honestly hard to know because we dont know what influence people like MacTavish, Howson, Green, Scott, Sutter etc have on the franchise and where it begins and stops. If those people have had any say on the pro-scouting side of things, its a fireable offense in my eyes, because it has been very bad for many years, including this year. I think the organization would be better if people had specific roles, one assistant GM for AHL, one assistant GM for NHL, director of amateur scouting, and then branch off from there. All these (vice) presidents, and director titles dont really mean anything, its such a generic title.
Someone like Woodcroft I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, this is his first year as an AHL coach and Bakersfield has had the most success it has in a long time. We have heard nothing but positive things.