"rebound control"...that's such a hilarious term on here. It very much like they're/their, regardless/,irregardless, accept/except and one i try not to mess up anymore since a poster on here corrected me...than/then. It misused all the time b/c alot of people do not understand the concept or the mechanics
You keep trying label me as a Skinner fan, but I'm not defending the player half the time, I'm defending against ppl who really don't know what they are typing. I'm defending specific plays in which they misinterpret just to complain
A perfect example of this is when they use the term "rebound control"
When used PROPERLY, it can be used to describe the goal the other nite where Stu took a shot from distance, kicked out a massive rebound to an opposing player who had half the net to score. Or on the faceplant goal. He takes an easier shot, bobbles it and let's the tap in(where was Bouchard on that play i will also maintain?)
However, you see it slung around here on last nites first goal, So thank you for proving my point. You see it slung out on the play the other nite in which the puck ended up on Skinners back pad and Nurse had to reach down and grab it
When you see ppl complaining about "rebound control" on those plays, it proves that somebody actually needs to point out that they are completely oblivious to what they are saying. That is NOT Skinner defending, it's simply pointing out the obvious in context w/ an actual understanding of the play in hand