TheNumber4
Registered User
- Nov 11, 2011
- 44,192
- 55,121
9 in a row for the Yotes, we want 10!
Holy crap they’ve fallen off the map.
9 in a row for the Yotes, we want 10!
Nah, regressed to the mean, they aren't a serious franchise, they weren't going to do anything, it was just a matter of time.Holy crap they’ve fallen off the map.
Your opinion, hes not a good goalie, we just have a really good team.If you had said this 30 times over the last 30 games you would have been wrong 29 times.
We will need 4 or 5 to win this oneSkinner pissed after his last outing so I think he has a really strong game today. Defensive game picked up in the third of the Dallas game as well, finally so expecting a low goals against finish. 1 goal against is my prediction, so get 2 or more and we win.
Your opinion, hes not a good goalie, we just have a really good team.
They could try falling off the map into another state.Holy crap they’ve fallen off the map.
should, the word is should.They could try falling off the map into another state.
Your opinion, hes not a good goalie, we just have a really good team.
We will need 4 or 5 to win this one
I mean I appreciate the commitment to being wrong, but I'm not here to correct your life choices.Your opinion, hes not a good goalie, we just have a really good team.
We will need 4 or 5 to win this one
I just don't get wanting the guy to fail. One subpar game and his hateboner is activated again.I mean I appreciate the commitment to being wrong, but I'm not here to correct your life choices.
He's set franchise records. If he wasn't "good" he wouldn't be able to do that.
Well, you have an irrational hate on for Skinner so shouldn’t you be happy about this?Why does Skinner get the easier starts and Picard the much harder games? Seems odd. Most of Pickards starts this year have been against very difficult opponents that can score.
Given that Skinner is being anointed again as our playoff goalie shouldn't he be seeing the playoff teams?
Yeah this has always baffled me. It's one thing to be upset that some are too positive, but actively hoping he fails is stupid to be quite frank.I just don't get wanting the guy to fail. One subpar game and his hateboner is activated again.
I mean I've voiced my distaste for the GM several times but it would be far better for the team if he improved the team in meaningful ways. This TDL will decide his legacy with this team.Yeah this has always baffled me. It's one thing to be upset that some are too positive, but actively hoping he fails is stupid to be quite frank.
There was nothing wrong with my asking why Skinner wouldn't be seeing the playoff teams that he's going to be seeing later. Thats a logical preposition about what ought to be occurring.Well, you have an irrational hate on for Skinner so shouldn’t you be happy about this?
There is no doubt. It's put up or shut up time for this. The team has shown ALOT, but clearly needs some help.I mean I've voiced my distaste for the GM several times but it would be far better for the team if he improved the team in meaningful ways. This TDL will decide his legacy with this team.
Didn't Skinner start against Vegas, the team we're probably going to be playing in April?There was nothing wrong with my asking why Skinner wouldn't be seeing the playoff teams that he's going to be seeing later. Thats a logical preposition about what ought to be occurring.
In response you could posit an answer to a reasonable question. you chose not to.
Honestly I think the idea behind giving Picakard the starts they have is to see if he is capable in the playoffs in case of a Skinner injury, or if we need to go get a backup at the deadline.There was nothing wrong with my asking why Skinner wouldn't be seeing the playoff teams that he's going to be seeing later. Thats a logical preposition about what ought to be occurring.
In response you could posit an answer to a reasonable question. you chose not to.
Thats one game. In Skinners last dozen starts he's played against 5 playoff clubs and 7 non playoff clubs. Thats even assuming Detroit and STL will be in playoffs.Didn't Skinner start against Vegas, the team we're probably going to be playing in April?
This is an answer. Thank You. Could be the case. I'm not certain its the right play but the answer is a plausible reason.Honestly I think the idea behind giving Picakard the starts they have is to see if he is capable in the playoffs in case of a Skinner injury, or if we need to go get a backup at the deadline.
Nah Nah Nah, they're just trying to pound his stats against weaker opponents to make him look descent so it's one less position for the GM to cross out on his To Do listThis is an answer. Thank You. Could be the case. I'm not certain its the right play but the answer is a plausible reason.