S1N4TR4
CBJ CBJ CBJ
- Nov 15, 2013
- 6,533
- 5,508
making a thread specific for the trade deadline as it is approaching quickly.
Last edited:
I don't think there is any chance I flip a 1st for Nyquist. GMDW alsready said he's not interested in short term rentals with expiring contracts and Nyquist's age and production so far does not warrant that for me. I could be ok with a mid to low round pick possibly but we also need to stop thinking short term and keep thinking long term. DW seems to be committed to this as he should be. Jarmo would be all in for short term success and blow up his own plan at this point like he did a few times when the team exceeded expectations.If Monahan,Chinakov & Jenner have returned or are ready to return I see no need to go big (if at all) at the deadline. A guy like Nyquist for Minnesota's 1st maybe but I don't see him as a guy that is going to make a big difference.
The other apparent conclusion fro GMDW's commnet is that Provorov is staying with the iintent to re-sign him. Although that is not as apparent as him staying thru the TDL.
I'm somewhere in between here - sure, look into acquiring Nyquist, but if the cost is a 1st (it shouldn't be) then no thanks.I don't think there is any chance I flip a 1st for Nyquist. GMDW alsready said he's not interested in short term rentals with expiring contracts and Nyquist's age and production so far does not warrant that for me. I could be ok with a mid to low round pick possibly but we also need to stop thinking short term and keep thinking long term. DW seems to be committed to this as he should be. Jarmo would be all in for short term success and blow up his own plan at this point like he did a few times when the team exceeded expectations.
I'm wondering what the plans for Kuraly, Danforth, and others are at the deadline.
I don't think there is any chance I flip a 1st for Nyquist.
I would add Mattias Maccelli to that list. Unless I am missing something, he seems to have fallen out of favour in Utah and he is a really interesting player. And Waddell specifically mentioned players with term.
I haven't seen anything about him being available, but you might be right, I haven't followed that particular situation at all.He's been available (and likely cheap to acquire) for a while now and we haven't picked him up despite the giant hole in our lineup.
Pretty much where I'm at but I'm also cautious on the desire to acquire former players that have moved on.I'm somewhere in between here - sure, look into acquiring Nyquist, but if the cost is a 1st (it shouldn't be) then no thanks.
Well, yeah, that's part of the point - he's a rental, but one we know is fairly capable and a decent leader. There's probably other options but he's one that easily comes to mind and is one we're already quite familiar with.Pretty much where I'm at but I'm also cautious on the desire to acquire former players that have moved on.
Like an ex-girlfriend, there is a reason the relationship ended and no matter how much you might pine for them its most likely not a good idea to get back together. Maybe in is case it wasn't him it was us but I'm still cautious and I still think he'd only be around the rest this season at 35 years old.
True. we'll see if he truly is interested in rentals despite what was said about not being interested in rentals but if he could fetch a low pick I'm down. Trade deadline just isn't one of those things where you get great deals on a contract that doesn't expire unless you act as a middle man to take salary as alluded in the Middelstadt connection.Well, yeah, that's part of the point - he's a rental, but one we know is fairly capable and a decent leader. There's probably other options but he's one that easily comes to mind and is one we're already quite familiar with.