OHLFan8771
Registered User
- Dec 6, 2011
- 1,045
- 0
I'm certain he'll recover just fine...but I'd be willing to wager he never plays competitive sports again. I had my competitive hockey career snuffed out at 18 with knee and shoulder problems. Doctor just told me point blank..."I can't help ya if you keep playing...you're doing irreversible damage". That was enough.I would have to agree,I didn't realize he had this much going on and thought it was only minor surgeory. Hope he recovers I'm sure it must be hard to deal with.
Ya...good thing Windsor has a disciplined player like Bilcke who NEVER takes penalties that cost his team in close games.hockeylegend11 said:Bilcke was credited with 9 hits in his 1st game back vs Erie,has not fought in the 3 games back and has had at least 3 scoring chances in that stretch,whhile he will never considered a scorer he is contributing,playing a reg shift,due mainly to roster shortage and
does not take unsportsmanlike penalties and misc like Leroux
Congratulations to London Knight Alumni, The Kadri Cream Egg on his first National Hockey League hat trick tonight!
Nazem "Cadbury" Kadri...goes back to last year when he showed up to camp quote unquote "fat"Garyboy you should right headlines for the Toronto Star. lol
Ya...good thing Windsor has a disciplined player like Bilcke who NEVER takes penalties that cost his team in close games.
Garyboy you should right headlines for the Toronto Star. lol
Nazem "Cadbury" Kadri...goes back to last year when he showed up to camp quote unquote "fat"
Bad call in a 3-2 game,Broadhurst dressed it up nicely,of course I know Knights fans
wont agree,spoke to a former OHL ref at the time,said he would not have made that
call either at that time in the game,so that works for me
Officiating did not cost Windsor the game,a lucky third goal did,bad break on a clear
hits stick right to a Knights player
Except for a bad ist period nice comeback in the 2nd,for a team missing 7 players
the result was predictable,especiallly when the other team only has 3 out
Btw nice call on Vail to give them 2 man adv in the 2nd, good thing Knights did
not score there
If you have a replay, watch Bilcke. He went up to make body contact with Broadhurst and then got his gloves in his face. Though it was a typical roughing call.
The Vail interference call was correct too. It was the same thing Zadorov was called on in the first period.
PPs were even if you take away the delay of game minor for Windsor but continue with the conspiracies.
I could be wrong but Ebert caught Anderson with a headshot in the first, looked like his feet left the ice, went uncalled of course. Curious if anyone was able to see a replay of that.
That " lucky" goal?
I'm sure if the Spits had scored it, it would be described as making your own luck, being hard on the puck, aggressive forechecking. As that is what happened. Hard on Murphy, hes lazy in Attempt to clear. Deflected by forechecker and a knights player beats a spits player to the blue ice to bang it in. Hard work plus opportunity equals luck
HL, u say the refs didn't cost u the game but bring it up Every time. Kinda weak IMO. You can take 10 plays each side every game and disect them. It gets old, is weak, and really starts to look like whining.
Bad call in a 3-2 game,Broadhurst dressed it up nicely,of course I know Knights fans
wont agree,spoke to a former OHL ref at the time,said he would not have made that
call either at that time in the game,so that works for me
Officiating did not cost Windsor the game,a lucky third goal did,bad break on a clear
hits stick right to a Knights player
Except for a bad ist period nice comeback in the 2nd,for a team missing 7 players
the result was predictable,especiallly when the other team only has 3 out
Btw nice call on Vail to give them 2 man adv in the 2nd, good thing Knights did
not score there
And to think I once respected your opinions. The bold portion lumps you in the same basket as the rest HL11. Strive for originality my friend.Typical response from someone on the winning side,not surprised and expected
Hockey gods were on the side of the Knights on the winning deflected puck right to the feet of another,bad break happens,as for the officiating keep in the whistle in your pocket in a 1 goal unless its obvious,and I say it for both teams,calls like that affect momentum
Bingo....said it before and I'll say it again...blaming the officials for your own team's short comings is the biggest cop out in the book.Typical response from someone on the LOSING side, not surprised and expected
You say you call it as you see it, and I don't doubt that, but every and I mean every loss you point out how the refs this, luck that.
Stale.
And to think I once respected your opinions. The bold portion lumps you in the same basket as the rest HL11. Strive for originality my friend.
Bingo....said it before and I'll say it again...blaming the officials for your own team's short comings is the biggest cop out in the book.
Nelli27
I would agree a pretty tame affair,not surprised considering Windsor"s depleted roster,as for Leroux he did his best to get Ebert to go,but Ebert did his Phaneuf impression vs Prust the other and passed on it,if Bilcke deserved his penalty so did Leroux deserve one except it didnt occur with 11 minutes left in a 1 goal game,put away the whistle
Your analysis on Domi pretty accurate great speed,a bit indiviualistic,was not his usual
chippy self
Re Ho Sang you are dead on,he as well is too individualistic ,thinks its river hockey out there,does not use his team mates enough,shoots when he should pass,passes when he should shoot
I for one hope the Knights continue to cruise as u say,makes for a nice possible exit
Maybe Leroux was after Ebert for headhunting. You see in London, our goons go after others when it's warranted, not just when the score is out of hand like other teams.
Goons fight Goons, thats the code,to go after a skill player is gutless,sometimes guys
check rides up on people ,other times players duck into a hit,sometimes its inadvertent
Ebert is not known to be a head hunter or dirty player,Anderson could dealt with it
himself,Leroux had no reason to seek retribution,i would probably think differently
if Ebert played dirty like the Ruperts,but he doesnt