StreetHawk
Registered User
- Sep 30, 2017
- 26,756
- 12,865
If they are going to do a payment over time, that puts their cash flow in a tough position when it comes to payroll and upgrades to the arena, practice facility, etc.People who know flagged this issue immediately. If Paolo wants to cash out they will have a big cash call on his stake that will almost definitely impact the business, unless they bring in a minority partner.
I would wager the inner family disagreement is around a lump sum upfront or some sort of structured payment agreement that allows them to pay him out of cash flow over time (plus interest), which could allow them to continue to operate at current burn without selling equity in the team to cover the cash call.
Opens up an interesting research assignment on CSE’s current leverage and debt capacity as well.
I mean, if the Canucks were to one day move Abby to Surrey (if they do build that 10K arena), then it makes sense to build the practice facility to accommodate the Surrey club as well with their own locker room in the facility and grant them access to everything. But, that requires planning and making sure they have the cash flow.
End of the day, so long as the family has majority control, does it matter that they own 60%, 80%, or 100% of the team?