Appleyard
Registered User
Right now they would pick:
#8
#20
#30
They SHOULD be able to get a potential 1C, star forward or 1D at 8 given how draft is likely to fall. If they pick correctly. Multiple will likely be sat there when you look back in 10 years.
Top 4 is set and then: Ryabkin, McQueen, Eklund, Smith, Frondell, Bear, Desnoyers, Mrtka, Reid and O'Brien are kind of the next group up. My guess is that ~5 of those 10 end up as real impact players, and 3 or so stars.
Now, I dont like all of those guys... but can understand why some people do.
And if are sensible should be able to get impact players at 20 and 30 too if ignore biases and go with best players. (Kindel for example is basically tracking to "impossible to fail to become a 60+ point NHLer if ignore his size)
Will be an interesting draft if they pick top 10 that is for sure.
#8
#20
#30
They SHOULD be able to get a potential 1C, star forward or 1D at 8 given how draft is likely to fall. If they pick correctly. Multiple will likely be sat there when you look back in 10 years.
Top 4 is set and then: Ryabkin, McQueen, Eklund, Smith, Frondell, Bear, Desnoyers, Mrtka, Reid and O'Brien are kind of the next group up. My guess is that ~5 of those 10 end up as real impact players, and 3 or so stars.
Now, I dont like all of those guys... but can understand why some people do.
And if are sensible should be able to get impact players at 20 and 30 too if ignore biases and go with best players. (Kindel for example is basically tracking to "impossible to fail to become a 60+ point NHLer if ignore his size)
Will be an interesting draft if they pick top 10 that is for sure.