I think he’s a great buy low with big upside potential if he could return to formUnless it's a huge bargain, I don't even think I would be interested in extending Bryant as part of a Cubs deal. There's way too much uncertainty given his injury and 2020 performance to be committing big dollars long term. I would view him as a pure rental until he has at least a couple months to show he's healthy and still the player he was prior to 2020.
Hey guys just a question they came to mind. We are giving a lot of pitchers and hitters a slide for having bad/terrible years in 2020. Now he’s not in their class but why are we not extending that same benefit to Roark? I would line a better option as all of you but just a question.
I think he’s a great buy low with big upside potential if he could return to form
He might want it but we don’t have to give it.That's a big IF...given how much he regressed, even with the potential to bounce back, I dont see how you could give him a big extension - which is what he'd want.
He might want it but we don’t have to give it.
It’s really not a big IF. He regressed in a COVID shortened season, was fine before that. Is he back to a 6-WAR? Not likely, but a 3/4 isn’t outside the realm of possibility.
And he’s supposedly unhappy there, so who’s to say going to a potential contender doesn’t rejuvenate him. He’s only 29.
Catchers tend to fall off a cliff earlier. I'd rather go after Starting pitching, especially when this team has Jansen/Kirk already who can do a more than fine job at holding the position down.I still really feel a Realmuto would be the icing on the cake for this team. His pitch framing and defense is the best of any catcher in the MLB. He can hit and his sprint speed is amazing as well. He is also only 29. Just makes to much sense and lets him mentor Kirk for the foreseeable future
I looked at his stats before posting that and it is crazy that as he got older he steadily got worse. But like in his twenties older. It’s not like it’s the twilight years.Because Roark wasn't that good to begin with. he's not a kid with upside or a high performer who had a bit of a swoon. He was a middling 4/5 type pitcher who turned around and imploded last year after several years of his stats trending in the wrong direction
in hindsight that was a pretty decent deal. Got some good production from Giles. Osuna's long term value due to being younger is probably negated by the big injury. And obviously avoiding the PR nightmare counts for something. I'd grade the deal a BPerez was the last piece of the Osuna trade and he was traded to make room for Springer. That makes it Osuna for Springer, right?
Point is we’d have a full season to consider it and the acquisition cost is likely not exceptionally high as there’s little chance he re-signs in ChicagoOf course we don't have to give it, but he'd likely go to free agency unless we did. I think Discoverer was probably already operating under that assumption, thus the not really interested in an extension at what it would likely take.
I'm not investing 10's of millions of dollars in pitch-framing, especially with the push for robot umpires. It's also why I think the Orioles' pick of Rutschman won't pay off for them, considering that "receiving" was hyped up as his best skill.
Point is we’d have a full season to consider it and the acquisition cost is likely not exceptionally high as there’s little chance he re-signs in Chicago
I don’t get your point. I never questioned anyone’s opinion on an extension or his value, I simply provided my opinion of his value and didn’t comment about an extension until someone else replied to my opinion on his fit and value here for next season.I don't think anyone disagrees with that. I think everyone you quoted was discussing an extension being a part of the trade meaning it happens right now.