Blue Jays Discussion: Off-Season Madness the 13th: Report - Dickey extended, trade just pending physicals

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Apologies, since you're just the unfortunate soul that has to be the last person in line that sets me off. This is not meant to be specific to you or an insult. But I digress


For the love of god people, STOP USING FIELDING PERCENTAGE! It's a terrible, horrible, unforgivably flawed stat because it's build on the king of terrible, horrible, unforgivably flawed stats - Errors. Errors are basically a worthless stat, and as such anything built on them are equally worthles, most of all fielding percentage.

Okay. I feel better now.
Why are errors useless? Yeah, they screw errors up a lot. But in the case of Edwin, a lot of his errors are completely earned. :laugh:

If someone historically has a lot of errors (and a low range) year after year, it's not because he's good at playing the field.

Don't get me wrong, there are better statistics, but over a career errors do tell a story.
 
Why are errors useless? Yeah, they screw errors up a lot. But in the case of Edwin, a lot of his errors are completely earned. :laugh:

If someone historically has a lot of errors (and a low range) year after year, it's not because he's good at playing the field.

people with good range will often get called for a error that most people wouldn't get get to, hence those with range usually have more errors
 
Agreed completely.

That said, thinking about the claims that it takes a few games after seeing a knuckleballer for batters to completely get their eye set again, I wouldn't mind a rotation of Morrow, Johnson, Dickey, Romero, Buehrle, just so that Romero, as likely our weakest pitcher out of the 5, gets the somewhat messed up batters.
I'd want to keep Buehrle and Romero apart because they're similar pitchers and our only lefties.
 
Andy Martino ‏@MartinoNYDN
Source: Dickey has passed his physical. So there you go. The CY Young winner has been traded to Toronto. It's done.

But he's 38, he's not allowed to pass his physical, he's a physical disaster ready to retire any moment now :sarcasm:

Why are errors useless? Yeah, they screw errors up a lot. But in the case of Edwin, a lot of his errors are completely earned. :laugh:

If someone historically has a lot of errors (and a low range) year after year, it's not because he's good at playing the field.

Don't get me wrong, there are better statistics, but over a career errors do tell a story.

Agreed 100%
 
Andy Martino ‏@MartinoNYDN
Source: Dickey has passed his physical. So there you go. The CY Young winner has been traded to Toronto. It's done.

Now it's time to shock the world and reveal that it's Dickey, Davis and Thole for Gose, Sierra, Lind and Buck

or at least let the rumour be wrong and it's just D'Arnaud
 
Why are errors useless? Yeah, they screw errors up a lot. But in the case of Edwin, a lot of his errors are completely earned. :laugh:

If someone historically has a lot of errors (and a low range) year after year, it's not because he's good at playing the field.

Don't get me wrong, there are better statistics, but over a career errors do tell a story.

I'm sorry, but no.

Errors don't consider so many things. You could range 250 feet to you right (just an outlandish example), and overthrow the first baseman and you'd still get an error in some cases. It doesn't consider range, arm strength, difficulty of play, batted balls, etc. All it is is one subjective opinion on whether someone cost their team an out. It's a horrible, horrible "stat".

I mean, look at Brett Lawrie. If errors were a valued statistic, he wouldn't be considered an excellent third-baseman defensively (still isn't by some). The fact of the matter is, is that errors just aren't a good way to gauge a players true defensive abilities.
 
Who the heck cares about John Farrell? He's gone. Let's just move on and be adults.

I could care less about him, but still can't wait for game #4 when the red sox come to Toronto.

I hope we all behave like adults and use "adult words" when he's introduced as the visiting manager.

:laugh:
 
I could care less about him, but still can't wait for game #4 when the red sox come to Toronto.

I hope we all behave like adults and use "adult words" when he's introduced as the visiting manager.

:laugh:

Did my last post answer your question? I'll try and clear any issues up if I'm able to.
 
I could care less about him, but still can't wait for game #4 when the red sox come to Toronto.

I hope we all behave like adults and use "adult words" when he's introduced as the visiting manager.

:laugh:

I just think that kind of thing reflects poorly on Blue Jay fans.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad