part of the hesitation in completely overhauling the PP is that it has worked in the past with the same personnel and the same umbrella strategy. last year for example we were at 21.2, 12th in the league running it exactly as we are now with the same personnel. last year we got 19 PP goals from defensemen at the point, this year with the same 4 guys we have 4 PP goals in over half a season. Subban had 5 last year, 0 this year. Josi 7 last year, 2 this year. ekholm had 5 last year, 1 this year.
injuries have no doubt played a huge part, especially Forsberg being out. 13 last year, only 4 PP goals this year.
no doubt the coaching staff is rationalizing that the PP will 'fix itself' once we are healthy again. but teams have also adapted to our PP by playing more of a 1-2-1 diamond type PK to get out on those three shooters, notice when our PP has actually been effective it has tended to be more against team that play a more tradition 2-2 type box (several of the eastern teams that haven't scouted us as much I think). also teams have adjusted to our drop pass zone entry as almost every team now runs it. it used to catch teams unprepared. no more.
personally I don't like our umbrella concept because we don't have enough down low presence, or that truly outstanding net front guy like a holmstrum or hornqvist that it really takes to make an umbrella the optimum approach.. it means our shots come from farther out than most PP's on average than any team that runs an overload and tries to work the puck in deep first... considerably farther out than any team in the league I would hazard to guess. the only way you make up for a low shooting percentage shot from far out is to get lots of them or lots of rebounds.. and we do neither.
. an umbrella also doesn't take advantage of our one really great passer, johansen either, as he is basically limited to just passing the puck back to the point. all in all, I look at our personnel and think we should run an overload, at least with our first unit. the second unit maybe not as much