- Nov 2, 2003
- 31,703
- 4,178
that's not that obscure; it's quoted all the time.
Even more interesting is that Roy lost more series in 7 games than he lost in 4, 5 and 6 combined. Even if you include series losses in 1987 and 88 in which he shared time with Hayward and count them as series losses all on him, Roy lost just 13 series, and 7 of them were 7 games.
Now think of all the series he won (31 I believe), which gives him a total of 44 series, just 6 of which he didn't win at least 3 games in. It was practically a sure thing (86%) from 1986 to 2003 that if you faced Patrick Roy in the playoffs, he was either going to beat you or take it to 7 games.
That's actually pretty incredible based on further evidence. It takes the whole idea of the 6-7 record and examines it. Amazing that 14% of the time a team played Patrick Roy they needed less than 7 game to do it. While the other 86% is him winning or stretching it to 7.
Sort of reminds me a bit of Sandy Koufax of the Dodgers. A 4-3 record in the World Series. Yet he has a 0.95 ERA in those games. That's just incredible and reflects poorly on the Dodger hitters that somehow Koufax lost three games while averaging less than one earned run against. Many people would pick Koufax as a guy they would pick as their #1 guy pitching in Game 7 of the World Series while the same can be said of Patrick Roy.