GDT: NYR @ WSH Part Two

[Ryan McDonut]

wow that in the net cam is amazing huh?

 

[The Gloaming]

So hard to see the puck.

 

[trilobyte]

I saw nothing but Holtby

 

[NYGBleedBlueNYR]

A dozen angles & u can't see the puck, perfect

 

[BB58]

Torts: Im gonna pull my goalie. LOL

 

[KingP]

hmm yea no goal

cant see it

 

[Stugots]

**** you holtby. *******

 

[Kokoschka]

gonna be ruled no goal.

 

[Riverdale]

Won't count

 

[Jarkko Immonen]

Sorta defines the way this game is going. Damn.

 

[bmw2004]

NY fans never loose hope!!!

 

[haohmaru]

No, you said the Rangers came back from being down two goals to win in a 3rd period. They never did that.

You were wrong.

And admitted it. So? Like beating a dead horse much?

 

[Doctor King Schultz]

Was it in his glove when he took it out of the net?

 

[RangersFan]

that is 100% a goal, but there won't be conclusive video evidence.

 

[haveandare]

I think it had to go in in order for Holtby to catch it that way. Having said that, you can't see it clearly.

 

[Ryan McDonut]

thats unbelievable. caught in his pads? only the rangers

 

[NYRANGERAMI*]

Have no Fear. Its a goal.

 

[PBarrz]

What's with the in net cam and not being able to see the right post?!

 

[Blueshirt Believer]

should be no goal. Its not definitive.

 

[Holocene]

You know they're gonna call it inconclusive even though its in the net.

 

[Clown Fiesta]

His glove is completely in the net, and you cant dig it out of your pants with a catching glove, but yeah won't count.

 

[SnowblindNYR]

It's one of those that we have benefited from. "Probably in but there's no way to prove it". Like the save Lundqvist made in the season opener against Boston. I'll be SHOCKED if they count this, and they shouldn't.

 

[RangersFan]

haha I just read rooney's lips, "it's probably a goal, but they can't see it"

 

[5 4 Fighting]

The puck went in, but there is no definitive evidence. No goal

 

[NYRANGERAMI*]

The refs are all saying.."I didnt see ****"