bl02
Registered User
- Jan 13, 2014
- 33,847
- 24,728
better be the lower of the two and no other good prospects involvedOuch, sucks to give up a 2023 first
better be the lower of the two and no other good prospects involvedOuch, sucks to give up a 2023 first
And sign them with what money? Any long term player you're paying a first for will require a cap hit we can't afford. Unless it's a young cost controlled player, which there aren't many of.How about acquiring a player who isn't a rental?
This organization has the patience of a 3 year old on a cross country car trip. No wonder we have one cup since FDR was president.
Things can go wrong. Very wrong. I hate giving up an unprotected first in a following year. At least this year we kinda' don't expect a top 10 pick.Not thrilled with this. Shouldve been a 2024 1st
For both of them, I'm absolutely fine giving up one of our firsts. Hopefully well conditioned so it's the worse one.Tank AND Mikkola per Seravelli. What a day
From what I've seen it's a normal draft after about pick 20, so it's whatever. They were never keeping both.
fair enough but it better be the lower of the 2 first rounders.Things can go wrong. Very wrong. I hate giving up an unprotected first in a following year. At least this year we kinda' don't expect a top 10 pick.
How about acquiring a player who isn't a rental?