bernmeister
Registered User
All I have to say is…. Really?! C’mon man.
what? really??!! c'mon!!!
- Rangers suffered but isolated drafted well/lucked into a couple of higher lottery draftees
- people get as I have been saying for some time now, hard cap means cheaper elc contracts are necessary to handle cap, worth more if productive or signif potential projected
- everybody wants Rangers blues blue chips
- other than maybe Jones who style wise is redundant due to Fox, we do not yet have SURPLUS bluest blue chips available for deals
- despite this, there are continued asks, which is fine, but then they don't take no for an answer, which is not.
- typically, it may be projected that short term returns for vets MAY or may not adequately improve NYR chances, but STILL NY has to overtake Colorado, Calgary, and coupla others who outplayed us this yr. And that is assuming we win out vs ballpark equals incl FL, CAR, PIT and others. So any such splurge is likely a stupid overreach when the smart play is get down to a younger core, and not only develop but enable increased chemistry by playing them w/minimum line, etc changes.
- complicating this further is CRUSHING level of cap hit caused by next year increase of Zib + Fox deals, requiring just over 11m cap from somewhere. We can just barely do that, but need to have scratch for LaF/Kakko etc down payment on their bridges as we await most of Trouba's 8m to be dealt and replaced by Schneider, w/Nils L fitting into Schneid's 3RD.
- this means I don't give a flying or a stationary fig to the contrary by beat writers [whether honest or looking for clickbait], NY cap means CAN NOT add anybody. IF they do, painful consequence likely to be forced sale of LaF/Kakko at reduced rates b'c league sees it is forced, and will offer less. THAT WOULD BE UNDESIRABLE AND UNACCEPTABLE.
- NY can only do select currency which trades up and consolidates in rare area of limited surplus which also reduces cap. So it does not pay to deal KA Miller to get Chychrun. But if we dealt Lindgren + Jones + 2 1sts + for Chych at half +, THAT would work. That is a youth for youth deal which actually helps slightly on cap.
- NY can do vets for vets, vets for youth, or youth for youth. It cannot do youth for vets.
Everything can be considered with an open mind to see if there is another exception which fits the above construct, like Chych.
But understand, it MUST fit this construct.
I make no apologies for telling it like it is, and for not wanting to take deals which do not work to long term best NYR interests w/most possible younger assets available for longer to max extend NY window.
I get some of this is subjective opinion. A large chunk of it is based on math, and cap reality, and is not.
Tell it like it is, let your conscience be your guide