Toggle sidebar

GDT: NYR @ BUF Part II

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm just going to sum up all of this in one post and be out for the night.

Hank let in soft goals, buyout Richards, Gaborik is a ghost, Del Zotto can't hit the net, trade Stepan for 5th and 6th round pick, Boyle sucks, bad penalties, power play is ****, Biron's 5 hole, trade Nash for Dubi and Arty, Callahan has hands of stone, McDonagh is staring out into space, Girardi blocks too many shots. Oh, and fire Torts.

Did I miss anything?
 
Jonathan. said:
Standing on his head with less than 20 shots (before the 3rd goal)? Yes. I want t see him standing on his head with a moderate amount of work. He had an excellent 1st period. He needs to have mroe than that in a game like this. Sorry that I want my super star Vezina caliber goalie playing better than this.

I ***** about a different player every game. Today it is Lundqvist and Gaborik. Next game it will be someone else.
Click to expand...

My point is, number of saves doesn't equate to quality of saves. Lundqvist faced the tougher chances this game. If Enroth faced 50 shots, Lundqvist still would have faced the tougher shots this game.

McDonagh and Girardi were that bad. The rest of the defensive core was that bad through the first two periods.

I do feel that the Sabres would have had 3-4 goals heading into the 3rd, with the chances they got, if it wasn't for Henrik. That's why I think your expectations were a little unrealistic.

That said, it is what it is. You're entitled to complain about any player you would like to (I know I do).
 
LeetchisGod said:
Drink everytime MDZ misses the net. Our point play in the offensive zone is abominable.
Click to expand...

Its becoming a serious problem. Our Point men are not good, under pressure, in the ozone. It really is crippling the offense.

Its a big part of our system...

Del Z didn't have a bad game though. Its guys like Girardi and McD who just make the worst decisions with the puck..

Girardi, especially, I hate as a pointmen.
 
Dangleberry said:
I'm just going to sum up all of this in one post and be out for the night.

Hank let in soft goals, buyout Richards, Gaborik is a ghost, Del Zotto can't hit the net, trade Stepan for 5th and 6th round pick, Boyle sucks, bad penalties, power play is ****, Biron's 5 hole, trade Nash for Dubi and Arty, Callahan has hands of stone, McDonagh is staring out into space, Girardi blocks too many shots. Oh, and fire Torts.

Did I miss anything?
Click to expand...

McDonagh's shot power is about the level of a PeeWee player. Add that one in.
 
Dangleberry said:
I'm just going to sum up all of this in one post and be out for the night.

Hank let in soft goals, buyout Richards, Gaborik is a ghost, Del Zotto can't hit the net, trade Stepan for 5th and 6th round pick, Boyle sucks, bad penalties, power play is ****, Biron's 5 hole, trade Nash for Dubi and Arty, Callahan has hands of stone, McDonagh is staring out into space, Girardi blocks too many shots. Oh, and fire Torts.

Did I miss anything?
Click to expand...

bring Avery back.
 
Blueshirt Believer said:
Its becoming a serious problem. Our Point men are not good, under pressure, in the ozone. It really is crippling the offense.

Its a big part of our system...

Del Z didn't have a bad game though. Its guys like Girardi and McD who just make the worst decisions with the puck..

Girardi, especially, I hate as a pointmen.
Click to expand...

Why isn't Stralman on the point? More than adequate defensively and has a nice slapshot to boot.
 
we should seriously trade nash. this guy has no heart in his game. we lost two of our fanchises best players, a defensive prospect with norris potential, and a 1st overall for this guy? holy **** talk about overpayment. fire slats, fire torts, and trade nash and his awful contract.



lol just kidding
 
Jonathan. said:
Oh, so the Swede who thinks Lundqvist is infallible has something to say to me? Once you can start being unbiased, I will acknowledge your opinion. Until then, keep thinking it matters to me.
Click to expand...
When you know the difference between a quality scoring chance and a flubber, I will take your opinion seriously.
 
Fataldogg said:
My point is, number of saves doesn't equate to quality of saves. Lundqvist faced the tougher chances this game. If Enroth faced 50 shots, Lundqvist still would have faced the tougher shots this game.

McDonagh and Girardi were that bad. The rest of the defensive core was that bad through the first two periods.

I do feel that the Sabres would have had 3-4 goals heading into the 3rd, with the chances they got, if it wasn't for Henrik. That's why I think your expectations were a little unrealistic.

That said, it is what it is. You're entitled to complain about any player you would like to (I know I do).
Click to expand...

Yes. I agree. But the problem is that we disagree on who outplayed who. I liked our game tonight, for the most part. We played an OK game. Should've won it or at least got it to OT if Hank even has an average game for him.

Enroth played out of his mind in comparison to what he usually brings. Just the breaks. He had to get out of that slump at some point. Figures it is against us, right?
 
Chimp said:
When you know the difference between a quality scoring chance and a flubber, I will take your opinion seriously.
Click to expand...

OK, brah. Let me know the next time you even think Lundqvist had an AVERAGE game. Even when I have posted that in the past, you just go ape **** (no pun intended). It's hilarious.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom