Proposal: Nyr-ana

[bfaust30]

Mcilrath + late pick for Clayton Stoner + Brandon Montour

Click to read more...

 

[Machinehead]

There's no way the Rangers are taking on Stoner with no cap space going the other way. The Rangers are more strapped than the Ducks are.

 

[bfaust30]

There's no way the Rangers are taking on Stoner with no cap space going the other way. The Rangers are more strapped than the Ducks are.

Rangers have over 2 mill in cap space and can move things around

 

[Machinehead]

Rangers have over 2 mill in cap space and can move things around

Stoner by himself makes more than that

 

[Number1RedWingsFan52]

Mcilrath + late pick for Clayton Stoner + Brandon Montour

Doubt that BM has any desire to move Montour just to move Stoners contract. And Anaheim doesn't need another D man in McIlrath coming back seeing that they already have an over abundance in the position.

 

[FLYLine27*]

No thanks.

 

[Number1RedWingsFan52]

Rangers have over 2 mill in cap space and can move things around

Stoner by himself makes $3.25 million does moving McIlrath plus the 2 mill cap space afford the Rangers Stoner. Doubt that Gorton ha much interest in helping BM out here.

 

[Spazkat]

Mcilrath + late pick for Clayton Stoner + Brandon Montour

What in gods name do the Ducks want with McIlrath? They need forwards, not D for the press box.

Also, the difference between an overpaid, but useful 6D in Stoner and McIlrath is not Montour.

 

[Static]

How can rangers fans say no to this??

 

[Ducks Nation*]

Just no

 

[Ducks in a row]

Mcilrath + late pick for Clayton Stoner + Brandon Montour

When will some people understand we don't want any defenseman even if we trade any away?

 

[Zegs2sendhelp]

Having Dylan on the team might make Fowler feel uncomfortable

 

[Duck Off]

both teams say no.

 

[bernmeister]

both teams say no.

this^.

 

[Machinehead]

How can rangers fans say no to this??

Salary. Cap.

 

[crowi]

no deal

 

[Sojourn]

Having Dylan on the team might make Fowler feel uncomfortable

Agreed. He'll probably be worried that he takes his spot, since McIlrath is the better player, and all.

 

[Lindberg Cheese]

What in gods name do the Ducks want with McIlrath? They need forwards, not D for the press box.

Also, the difference between an overpaid, but useful 6D in Stoner and McIlrath is not Montour.

The difference is how your team looks with Lingholm signed....agree though that this is not the trade

 

[Lindberg Cheese]

I think a 3 way trade is possible between Win/Ana/NYR. The major pieces being Fowler, Trouba, and Hayes or Millet with additions/picks/cap issues made where necessary.....

 

[bernmeister]

I think a 3 way trade is possible between Win/Ana/NYR. The major pieces being Fowler, Trouba, and Hayes or Millet with additions/picks/cap issues made where necessary.....

it can only be a senior vet, like Zuc
otherwise no

 

[AngelDuck]

The Ducks do not need to give up a top 30 prospect like Montour to get rid of Stoner. There is some other permutation of assets (2nd round pick + lesser but still solid prospects) and some other team out there that will take him IMO. For as bad as his contract is, if you add a couple decent assets to it I think there's a GM that will stomach taking it

 

[Static]

Salary. Cap.

They'd. Make. It. Work. For. That. Quality. Of. A. Prospect.

 

[Machinehead]

They'd. Make. It. Work. For. That. Quality. Of. A. Prospect.

I don't think they actually could. Much of the Rangers' cap is not movable.

 

[Raspewtin]

How can rangers fans say no to this??

We can't afford it.

They'd. Make. It. Work. For. That. Quality. Of. A. Prospect.

Who are they moving to make it work? Girardi? Staal? Who's taking them?

Klein is the only piece they could move to make the space and I have a really hard time believing they'd leave our RHD as Girardi, Holden on his off wing, and Clendening.

 

[Mersss]

The Ducks do not need to give up a top 30 prospect like Montour to get rid of Stoner. There is some other permutation of assets (2nd round pick + lesser but still solid prospects) and some other team out there that will take him IMO. For as bad as his contract is, if you add a couple decent assets to it I think there's a GM that will stomach taking it

Hawks needed to give up Teravainen to get rid of 1 YEAR of Bickell
Det had to give a 1st round pick in order to get rid of Datsyuk's contract

Why would a team settle for a late 2nd and a B prospect when referring to these trades? If the Ducks want to get rid of Stoner, IMO Theodore or Mountour are goign the other way as NONE of your other prospects compares to a 16th OA pick or Teravainen. Ritchie hasn't shoiwn anything similar to Teravainen and Larsson isn't as a good Teravainen or a 16oa pick