Brick City
Ignore me!
He may assume the debt or pay it off. Either way, the removal of Vanderbeek/DAE/Devils from the debt means that that $170mm is part of the $320+mm total purchase price.
If DAE/Devils were separated from the debt, wouldn't that pretty much mean Harris is assuming it personally (or through one of his entities). Practically, I think that would be the same thing as the loans being paid off entirely.
This would be bad news.
The New York Times is contradicting the other reports that claim the debt is being taken out in the transaction. When you "assume" debt, it means that you're taking on responsibility for the existing obligation.
However, as I've mentioned before, when you get reporters that specialize in sports and dont understand the financial terms they're tossing about, they do sometime misuse terms like you're noting (i.e. claiming "8th most profitable arena in the world" when all you really know is the top-line revenue reported and thus cant make that claim).
I dont have access to NYT, is this article from their Finance Department or their Sports Department? I was surprised that this thing was emerging completely debt free, soooooooooo, this would explain my surprise if NYT is correct. Lets hope they're wrong.
Both of the reporters on the NYTimes article are sports guys. I have seen a variety of sports reports that use 'assume' and 'cover' when talking about the debt so perhaps I should not read into it too closely right now. While I still am excited about a new rich owner, my jubilation will be somewhat diminished if the vast majority of the debt isn't departing along with Vanderbeek's control of the team.
Last edited: