GDT: (Not Quite Yet) Timo Time: Your New Jersey Devils (39-15-5) @ Colorado Avalanche (34-19-5), 9 PM, MSGSN

HBK27

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2005
14,178
15,327
Northern NJ
It was too close to call...plus I hate having goals overturned on plays like that that had zero impact.
 

Blender

Registered User
Dec 2, 2009
52,523
46,252
Under the current rules that's the correct call. They changed the rules after we got f***ed by the old one a bunch of times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PWiz30

Cheddabombs

Status Quo
Mar 13, 2012
25,530
34,443
giphy.gif
 

TrufleShufle

Registered User
Aug 31, 2012
8,425
14,003
I know everyone is pissed, but that was not offsides, the fact the player without the puck put his foot back over the line before the player "with" the puck crossed is all that matters. It was an insanely short dump in.
 

jkrdevil

UnRegistered User
Apr 24, 2006
43,064
13,090
Miami
That's horse shit. It was pretty clearly off
it was the right call. He didn’t carry the puck in, he pushed it in and the Avs player on the other the other side got back onside before they touched the puck or another player entered the zone. It was a tag up play. Same as in the playoffs last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TrufleShufle

jkrdevil

UnRegistered User
Apr 24, 2006
43,064
13,090
Miami
I think you flipped that. A tag up is allowed because he didn't carry the puck over the line, but pushed it over then regained control. As long as the player is back onside when the puck is touched again it's legal.
yes, typo on my part using an iPad.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad