Noah Cates next contract
- Thread starter FlyguyOX
- Start date
-
Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
freakydallas13
Registered User
2 years 2 mil per.
The Flyers will offer him 7 x 5.9.
The Flyers will offer him 7 x 5.9.
Beef Invictus
Revolutionary Positivity
Lord Defect
Secretary of Blowtorching
- Nov 13, 2013
- 19,270
- 35,466
I can’t believe dude wanted to give Cates 8x8 two years ago and I just learned Cates name and that he’s a flyer a month or so ago.
bennysflyers16
Registered User
- Jan 26, 2004
- 87,132
- 65,595
It will be 8 yrs, just hope its less than 5 mill.
They are using this guy to justify raising ticket prices , this guy is a foundation pillar to these dinos.
They are using this guy to justify raising ticket prices , this guy is a foundation pillar to these dinos.
deadhead
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2014
- 52,231
- 22,704
Foerster and Cates have the highest GAR/xGAR on the team.
They're valuable role players, middle six forwards but really good middle six forwards.
Cates was a top defensive specialist at center as a rookie, last year when he returned from injury he showed he could be a 2LW for a scoring center if needed, and this year he's been a solid 2C/3C, although he's sacrificed some defense for more offense, that should balance out with experience.
Cates has improved his skating to where it's above average, he has the best stick in terms of puck possession in crowds and causing turnovers, he's a fine forechecker and PK guy, he's improved his playmaking skills and vision. What's not to like?
He has limitations, he'll never be an offensive force, he's improved as a passer and has a decent shot, but no standout skill. While he has wiry strength, he's slight below average in size, he's become a good but not special skater. His best attribute is his defensive IQ.
I'd be wary about term, if he wants more than 5 years, I'd want a discount on AVV b/c I think he'll start to fall off after 30. But if I can get a discount up front, don't mind overpaying the out years when the cap goes up.
Cates is clearly superior to Laughton or even Pageau.
Given the rise in the cap, I'd expect something in the $4-5M range
They're valuable role players, middle six forwards but really good middle six forwards.
Cates was a top defensive specialist at center as a rookie, last year when he returned from injury he showed he could be a 2LW for a scoring center if needed, and this year he's been a solid 2C/3C, although he's sacrificed some defense for more offense, that should balance out with experience.
Cates has improved his skating to where it's above average, he has the best stick in terms of puck possession in crowds and causing turnovers, he's a fine forechecker and PK guy, he's improved his playmaking skills and vision. What's not to like?
He has limitations, he'll never be an offensive force, he's improved as a passer and has a decent shot, but no standout skill. While he has wiry strength, he's slight below average in size, he's become a good but not special skater. His best attribute is his defensive IQ.
I'd be wary about term, if he wants more than 5 years, I'd want a discount on AVV b/c I think he'll start to fall off after 30. But if I can get a discount up front, don't mind overpaying the out years when the cap goes up.
Cates is clearly superior to Laughton or even Pageau.
Given the rise in the cap, I'd expect something in the $4-5M range
BillDineen
Former Flyer / Extinct Dinosaur Advisor
- Aug 9, 2009
- 9,787
- 8,759
Almost certainly too much for too long. They will focus on his good periods and ignore the bad and overpay.
freakydallas13
Registered User
He absolutely did not show that last year, unless you think 18 points (pacing for 25) is good enough to be a second line winger.
What's above a first line forward? I'm assuming that's what Frost is if Cates "showed he could be a 2LW" last year. Konency is, what, a negative 2nd line forward?
Signing an about to be 26 year old player yet to crack 90 total points in the NHL to any kind of term longer than a few years is lunacy.
deadhead
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2014
- 52,231
- 22,704
I said when he came back from his injury.
38g xGF 63.56%, HDCF 63.75%, xGF/60: 3.14 (best among forwards), HDCF/60: 16.17 (best on team)
Played with: Poehling 233, Hathaway 219 Couts 83, Foerster 54. Which explains his low scoring rate.
With real forwards, this year he's scoring 2.04 pp/60 at ES, Couts 1.93, Poehling 1.78, Frost 1.77.
He's not a great player, but he's be a great complementary LW with an offense first center.
Lord Defect
Secretary of Blowtorching
- Nov 13, 2013
- 19,270
- 35,466
He’s not a great player? You called him elite.
freakydallas13
Registered User
No, his lack of offensive game explains his low scoring rates. We can argue wether he's a 20 point player or a 40 point player, but neither of those players belong on the second line.
Another overpayment for too many years just like Tippett you can expect to see Cates for the next decade. #culture
Magua
Entirely Palatable Product
deadhead
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2014
- 52,231
- 22,704
What do you think the median second line forwards scores at ES?
The median is #144 (96 1st, 48 2nd). Scored 30 ES points last season. EH (excluding empty net)
This season 18 points in 50 games, or 30 points prorated.
Overall 43 points including PP and SH.
freakydallas13
Registered User
Great, pumped for the Flyers to resign him and be a median NHL team for the remainder of his 7 year contract. Mission accomplished.
mize370
Registered User
Cates should get $1 more then the highest contract. 38 career hi in points are hard to find.
He's improved but I think he's more likely to be a cap problem than a positive value of he signs to five years
BobbyClarkeFan16
Registered User
These advances statistics are so misleading and can be skewed so easily. Yes, they do indicate a player's usefulness, but they don't paint a whole picture of the player. There's usage, zone starts, linemates etc...
Sometimes, you actually have to WATCH a player play and not rely on these stats.
As for deal for Cates, 3 years/$11 million. That's more than fair for what he brings to the table.
Sometimes, you actually have to WATCH a player play and not rely on these stats.
As for deal for Cates, 3 years/$11 million. That's more than fair for what he brings to the table.
