Speculation: No. 30 in MSG Rafters

[AHB*]

He will most likely be top 10 all time in wins with a stellar SV% and GAA. I agree that he could be a HHOF inductee as well.

If he stays healthy, there's a very good chance he will be top 3.

 

[CHGoalie27]

Presented without comment:

is it possible to provide a few more from of the best stat compilers that started in 05? Maybe Thomas or Quick or Rinne?

 

[AlternateSideParking]

They could have retired it two seasons ago.

 

[CHGoalie27]

^Yep!

If he stays healthy, there's a very good chance he will be top 3.

Health is the only thing potentially stopping him, obviously the most consistently p!ss poor defense hasn't messed Hank up! Redden Roszival McCabe(I can be here for awhile, top 3 is fine)

 

[AHB*]

^Yep!


Health is the only thing potentially stopping him, obviously the most consistently p!ss poor defense hasn't messed Hank up! Redden Roszival McCabe(I can be here for awhile, top 3 is fine)

Hard to believe he will actually be up there in shutouts all time as well.

If he averages 4 per year over that contract, which would give him 30 more, he would be 9th.

If he averages 6 he would be 4th, and within 3 of 3rd.

Just amazing.

Just wanted to Edit also, regarding CUJO, look at his historical references and his games played.

If Hank played the same number of games as him and won only roughly half of them from here on out, he would be 50-60 wins ahead of him and around 500 all time.

Signifcantly better. Also, regarding shutouts, he will catch him either this or next year as he is only 2 away. Also, much of Cujo's career, including most of his prime, was during the dead puck era.

 

[Thirty One]

They could have retired it two seasons ago.

Then what number would he wear?

 

[Thirty One]

is it possible to provide a few more from of the best stat compilers that started in 05? Maybe Thomas or Quick or Rinne?

I started Quick and Rinne at Lundqvist's 2007-08 total (they weren't starters until the next year).

 

[CHGoalie27]

I started Quick and Rinne at Lundqvist's 2007-08 total (they weren't starters until the next year).

Thank you!!

All three Canes goals tonight were a prime example of why stats aren't the final word in judgement. He was all we had tonight in my opinion. Goals from guys who had no business being comfortably open so close to the net. Again.

 

[chosen]

No, I've seen them all. AND I'm quite objective. Regurgitating something you could've read in the Hockey News doesn't mean anything toward what I've seen and know.

Funny thing is, just based on his style alone, I called him the best I've seen back in 2005 after we won that 15 round SO and I got the same thing you just gave me. He has yet to fail on backing me up, so I don't see how I haven't seen enough goalies (which is the dumbest damn thing I think anyone's told me recently).

Anyway, Hasek and Roy are the next best to me if it matters. As much as we've all heard the debate, I don't know which I'd takeover the other, because I see things objectively

Hasek is the best I have ever seen. Henrik may end up in the debate for number two.

 

[Crease]

The thing about Roy and Hasek was that they were just so much better than their peers. Not just consistently elite, but also a step above the rest of the pack. Lundqvist is consistently elite, but he is rarely if ever a step above of the rest like Roy and Hasek were. He doesn't outright dominate his peers. Lundqvist is like Brodeur in that sense.

 

[Baby Punisher]

Presented without comment:

Why wasn't Richter in this comparison?

 

[Crease]

Why wasn't Richter in this comparison?

It'd probably be too embarrassing for Mike.