Tatar Shots
Registered User
- Feb 2, 2014
- 5,862
- 1,931
Nino and Bean for Demko?Nino is the sort of player the Canucks could probably use as a complementary piece in their Top-6. But i'm not sure what they'd have to offer, and they'd have to figure something out to absorb the cap hit, when they really don't have much of any room to spare. Getting a piece on defence is probably the bigger priority though anyway. Which Carolina seems like a potentially good fit for...so maybe there's something that could get worked out by piling Nino into a deal with someone like Bean/Fleury.
Nino would probably look really good under Trotz. Not sure what he could fetch from NYI.
Nino and Bean for Demko?
Maaaybe Hornqvist. That could actually help both teams. But that said, Hornqvist has positive value, probably slightly higher than Nino who might have a neutral value. Carolina probably adds something but discussion can be here around these two. Another offer could be McCann + Bjugstad for Nino.
Carolina deserved more from the series vs Boston (every game was close), but at the same time Carolina was clearly missing some skill in their depth players up front. Without the top guys carrying the load, their depth failed to fill-in on the score-sheet.
Nino's contract has 2 years left at 5.25 million per year. He is actually a fairly effective player on the ice but he cannot seem to turn that into production, which is something that Carolina desperately needs in their bottom 6. Nino's contract is not bad per-se but the money being given to him can be better spent on someone like Cirelli, Barzal, Reinhart, Burakovsky, or Mikheyev. (Pending fwd RFA's that could be trade bait or offer-sheet bait).
What could Carolina get for Nino realistically? Would they have to add any value onto him to get rid of his contract?
decent for a depth forwardBarzal for bottom 6? What planet do you reside on?
**** that.
Nino and Fleury for VAN 1st.
Barzal for bottom 6? What planet do you reside on?
Ferland worked well with them as well when healthy. I think the big need on that line is simply a disruptor with skill. When Nino is on he brings that, but when he's not he's overpaid by about 2m per to be a bottom 6 kinda but not overly physical guy that chips in about 15 goals a season and is defensively responsible. At 3 million that's a good player, but at 5 that's dead cap space. Hornqvist wouldn't be a bad target but he's older on a longer contract for about the same production historically.Nino is a frustrating player for sure. He has size, skill, wicked shot, plays physical and does a lot of the little things right it’s just that his decision making is like a second too slow or something.
I always say an angry Nino is a good Nino. When he’s playing with emotion and is engaged you will get good hockey out of him and when he’s hot he can be a PPG player. It’s just a matter of putting him in the right situation and matching up with the right line mates to make that happen. I think the problem is that no one has cracked the code as to what right situation/line combo is on a consistent basis to get those results.
As a Canes fan I would love nothing more than for Nino to be our top line LW and at times he he worked great with Aho and TT but just not consistently enough. But the weird thing is, other than Svech there hasn’t really been anyone else who has consistently worked there either which is very odd because you would think you could put a pumpkin with those two and get decent results.
Anyway, a team looking to bolster their top 6 who has cap space could hit a homerun with Nino and the return would be minimal. Canes have over extended themselves on defence (again) and need cap flexibility to work that out and find the right fit for our top 6.
So either a mid round pick would do OR ideas for players like Hornqvist (RH shot hard nosed gritty vet with some scoring touch at similar money) could work as well.
Out of the names thrown around in this thread, Palmieri and Burakovsky (Not an RH shout though) have been the most interesting for sure
Nino is what you have seen from this past season. He had 2 excellent runs. The final year of his prior contract where he put up like 57 points. Expectation was that he made it and that 55 plus points would be his new benchmark. The second run was the 30 he put with when he arrived in Carolina last season thus all the threads about how great a move it was.Carolina deserved more from the series vs Boston (every game was close), but at the same time Carolina was clearly missing some skill in their depth players up front. Without the top guys carrying the load, their depth failed to fill-in on the score-sheet.
Nino's contract has 2 years left at 5.25 million per year. He is actually a fairly effective player on the ice but he cannot seem to turn that into production, which is something that Carolina desperately needs in their bottom 6. Nino's contract is not bad per-se but the money being given to him can be better spent on someone like Cirelli, Barzal, Reinhart, Burakovsky, or Mikheyev. (Pending fwd RFA's that could be trade bait or offer-sheet bait).
What could Carolina get for Nino realistically? Would they have to add any value onto him to get rid of his contract?
Paul Byron + 2nd?
Habs get bigger and canes save ~2million in cap space
Or
2020 2nd + 2021 2nd
For
Nino +2021 3rd
No real need for Byron, but I’d do that deal for picks in a heartbeat.
Miles Wood plus your 3rd rounder back
I'd do that as a Canes fan. Even if VAN went to the conference finals and that pick was #27-31.