I'm sure some people might prefer others teams assets but what teams out there have more traceable assets then the leafs (valuable pieces not attached to trade clauses)?
Which teams?
Problem is Zaitsev isn't a top 4 level D! So the Leafs will have to take back something to get rid of his contract.
Considering the flyers can't and haven't made the playoffs in years, I disagree. And their best asset (giroux) has a nmc.Flyers come to mind. I'm sure there's plenty more.
Wait did you just accuse leaf fans of death threats.... without posting a link and specific lines that we can read about it?
You clearly are lying then right? I mean you can’t expect me to actually google the articles and find them.
It’s a big accusation. Please link specific articles and tell me what lines the threats are on.
You said hundreds. Please find me hundreds
Of death threats.
Do you know all of the other 30 GMs? Otherwise you as another nobody on HF doesn't know if any of them would be willing take on Zaitsev's contract without sending something back to Toronto as part of any deal. Relax, it's a fan forum where everyone gives their opinion and nobody is right or wrong! All non-Leafs fans on HF know how much Leafs fans are hoping that the Leafs can get rid of Marleau and Zaitsev's contracts without taking any contracts back! So keep praying it turns out that way!According to a nobody on HF. Meanwhile people who get paid to know this stuff say otherwise.
Just in case you didn't know the Flyers made the playoffs last year!Considering the flyers can't and haven't made the playoffs in years, I disagree. And their best asset (giroux) has a nmc.
The others?
‘I had 300 death threats in one night’: April Reimer, wife of Maple Leafs goalie, recounts Twitter attack
See how easy it is when you’re not full of ****?
You're right. I stand corrected.Just in case you didn't know the Flyers made the playoffs last year!
Considering the flyers can't and haven't made the playoffs in years, I disagree. And their best asset (giroux) has a nmc.
The others?
Why?You might want to reconsider this.
You expect me to read that? I can’t be expected to click Show me the lines....
If it was so easy then you could have just posted it in the original reply. Rather than making me ask for you to send me it.
I mean it was pretty crazy for you to just post something and expect people to believe you or actually look for it themselves.
Why?
I think you're on an island in believing the flyers have accumulated more assets then the leafs.
And these other teams?
I mean, I am in Montr
I like the dodging.... we can let it goI mean, I am in Montréal...
No, see, I gave you a direct link. You said “April sometime it’s on YouTube. It’s a two hour video and have no idea when it was said but it’s there! (It wasn’t)
Aw, someone is still angry he got exposed. It’s okay. You’ll get over it someday.
I actually gave you the title the month aAnd the podcast. And then you said you wouldnt listen without a time stamp.
And it turns out that it did exist.....
And CJ did say “they have to move on from him” and that it’s believed he would benefit from a change of scenery
I mean you clearly should have known to link this right away.... but you still haven’t read it for me and “linestamped” any threats.
So please do that for me. You can’t expect me to read it myself.
You can cut and paste them if it’s easier.
He gave an opinion, you presented it as fact. You also put words in his mouth that he never said. You also refused to back yourself up (because you knew you’d shoved your foot in your mouth down to the kneecap)
Have I given you enough attention yet? This is incredibly boring. Can I tell you you’re pretty and you’ll go away?
Reimer is the bigger problem because of contract being 2 years at 3m+ for a backup.Assuming you can move Marleau, it's fine since Pysyk is done after next year.
CJ quoted directly. “They need to move on from him”. That’s what he said. You can choose to believe that’s an opinion. Or that he’s talked to the oilers and the camp. Sure.
I think most rational people would just read/listen and confirm their own. but since you believe it is the responsibility of people
To spoon feed information.
You should probably put the articles in right away. With specific quotes.
Because really without quotes. We are talking about someone’s speculation/opinion on statements.
I’m sure they are. But I mean for someone so serious about these things. You should find the hundreds of quotes so we can see.
You should probably live up to your own standards.
I did what a reasonable non-liar would do. You twisted in the wind. I’ve expended enough energy on this.
You’re pretty sweetie. Now go home.
You don’t know that I’m pretty. That’s speculation. Shouldn’t say it as fact.
Like I said. Those are your rules not mine.
I choose to believe the statements of a paid insider with a good reputation. I also choose to believe the word of an innocent person who was threatened.
I also choose to believe that people can read/listen for themselves to find public information like posted articles and podcasts. It’s kinda the whole point. They actually really want you to.
That’s what I believe
If you don’t and you need proof to the minute/sentence. You have to live up to it.
If you want to claim that leaf fans sent hundreds of death threats to April
Reimer. By your logic you have to post the hundreds of specific threats. So we can all see.
Soooooo you should probably get on that.
Or you could read the link I posted. Like any reasonable person would do when asked about a claim they’ve made. Which - I have to again stress - he said nothing remotely close to what you were claiming.
You do not have the moral high ground here. You were exposed as full of crap. Deal with it, it’s your own fault.
Or you could read the link I posted. Like any reasonable person would do when asked about a claim they’ve made. Which - I have to again stress - he said nothing remotely close to what you were claiming.
You do not have the moral high ground here. You were exposed as full of crap. Deal with it, it’s your own fault.
Or you could read the link I posted. Like any reasonable person would do when asked about a claim they’ve made. Which - I have to again stress - he said nothing remotely close to what you were claiming.
You do not have the moral high ground here. You were exposed as full of crap. Deal with it, it’s your own fault.
Really ???You expect me to read that? I can’t be expected to click Show me the lines....
Really ???