Er no he isn't and while I think I'd take him over Brett it's not as wide as the results indicate either.Kucherov is up there with Brett’s dad, Bobby.
Er no he isn't and while I think I'd take him over Brett it's not as wide as the results indicate either.
The thing is that Brett in a 6 year period for 89-90 to 94-95 had almost 100 more regular season goals than the next best player and was 3rd in points and he actually has a pretty good playoff resume as well.Yeah he’s definitely in between the two somewhere but I’d argue he’s closer to Brett
The thing is that Brett in a 6 year period for 89-90 to 94-95 had almost 100 more regular season goals than the next best player and was 3rd in points and he actually has a pretty good playoff resume as well.
He just didn't play on very well constructed teams in his peak years but I think people are forgetting what a good sniper he was.
Patrick Kane says "lol wat".He is the best playoff performing winger of the 2000s
LoL. Not even close.Kucherov is up there with Brett’s dad, Bobby.
Old person here. Watched Bobby too. He was great but so is Kooch. Kooch is a better player than Brett. Definitely closer to Bobby.LoL. Not even close.
Bobby Hull was top 10 all time. Look at his scoring finishes in both goals and assists.
Why would he say that?Patrick Kane says "lol wat".
Because the best playoff winger of the 2000s is him.Why would he say that?
These 2 things don't match up as outside of their primes, Hull has more right?Voted for Kucherov barely
Prime is Brett Hull for sure
People on this forum act like Brett Hull was a beer league player. I don't care how one dimensional he is perceived to be, he scored 741 goals, won 2 Cups, has a Hart and a Lindsay. He is top-5 all time in goals. So, no, I don't think you can say "Kucherov by a wide margin" as of right now.