Two players who should benefit and kickstart their career with a new environment.
So what do you think of this proposal?
So what do you think of this proposal?
Kings would do the same with Robertson, so this whole suggestion is pointless.Don’t see the leafs doing this. Fagemo hit waivers twice last year
OkKings would do the same with Robertson, so this whole suggestion is pointless.
would rather hold onto to Robertson. Still believe he could develop into a top 6 forward if given the proper opportunity.Not saying either team does it, but how about Podkolzin for Robertson?
would rather hold onto to Robertson. Still believe he could develop into a top 6 forward if given the proper opportunity.
Fagemo would be a nice little add-on, valued at around a 6th or 7th rounder, to tack on to a serious offer. Might tip the scales. But nothing more
Sure. Or, if they like him and LA likes Robertson, LA could trade a real asset for Robertson and theow Fagemo in as a sweetener. See what I’m getting at?Or just get him on waivers for nothing.
Sure. Or, if they like him and LA likes Robertson, LA could trade a real asset for Robertson and theow Fagemo in as a sweetener. See what I’m getting at?
And that means he had to be traded?I thought he requested a trade?
That is literally what I am suggesting.No, because Fagemo doesn't have any value at this point. The "sweetener" would have to be the main piece with Fagemo as a throw-in. Fagemo cleared twice last year, so if they were interested they would have taken him in either time.
No team is trading a player with value, for a player with no value with something minor tacked on.
doesn't mean they have to move him.I thought he requested a trade?