from reading the Bruins board a couple days back, and sifting through the nonsense after he eventually signed with TOR, I noticed a couple things. One thing being was that he was an extremely polarizing player to their fanbase throughout the entirety of the season. Almost like an Engvall here. Lots of comments referencing lazy play, and a lack of desire to use his size. Almost identical beefs that I have with Engvall. There were also a crowd of people who were quick to point out his production and where he slotted in the lineup and poo poo any of his shortcomings. On paper, I like the name, and I have always kind of liked the player. But I really don't think he will come as I imagined. I don't think he will produce a ton of points outside of the top 6, and I am not too sure he has the ability to consistently play at a level that warrants him being there. Further, his hits/60 is more in line with an Adam Brooks and Jesse Puljujarvi than it is the premier hitters in the league, Indicating he doesn't finish his checks as much as a guy his size should. For example, his average TOI is just over 15.22 mins per game and he averages 7.11 hits in that 60 mins, whereas a guy like Adam Lowry was able to register 11.96 hits/60 with roughly the same amount of ice time. I recognize hits/60 is a rate and does not need to compared to average TOI, but it kind of shows how each player faired in similar roles. From that statistic alone, I can see why the fanbase would jump on him, especially if/when the offense dry's up.
I guess we will have to just wait and see with Nick, I'll say I am cautiously optimistic that he can find the next gear. Still a young player with 1st round pedigree. Maybe wearing the blue and white will be that spark he needs