dogs777
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2025
- 37
- 23
Can’t comment on period 2 but Flores and the entire top line (RR AA He) for period 1So anyone want to play “Who was suspended”?
Game 1
Period 1:
Game 2
Period One:
Period Two:
Can’t comment on period 2 but Flores and the entire top line (RR AA He) for period 1So anyone want to play “Who was suspended”?
Game 1
Period 1:
Game 2
Period One:
Period Two:
…and Brauti. Period one.Can’t comment on period 2 but Flores and the entire top line (RR AA He) for period 1
Ah totally didn’t realize he wasn’t there…and Brauti. Period one.
I don’t think you quite understand it. This was league mandated amongst other requirements.so the way I understand it:
Players get into some shenanigans. League gets a complaint. League tells them that a punishment has to happen. Ice Dogs say they will handle it internally. League believes them. So while yes, the league did mandate punishment as reported, they did not mandate THIS SPECIFIC punishment. Don't know why the league let them decide what the punishment was going to be. Leave it to Ice Dogs brass to make it a spectacle.
That's close. However, the league (Bryan Crawford) did a thorough investigate of theatre-gate and your correct in that IceDogs were involved, in part, on the decision on how to serve their punishment. Our IceDogs' logo has another black eye.so the way I understand it:
Players get into some shenanigans. League gets a complaint. League tells them that a punishment has to happen. Ice Dogs say they will handle it internally. League believes them. So while yes, the league did mandate punishment as reported, they did not mandate THIS SPECIFIC punishment. Don't know why the league let them decide what the punishment was going to be. Leave it to Ice Dogs brass to make it a spectacle.
Agreed.I think we collectively have this figured out? Is this accurate?
Game 1
Period 1: Crete, Arrowsmith, DeWatcher, Cheynowski, Galiyinov
Game 2
Period One: Brauti, He, RR, AA, Flores
Period Two: NVV, Loshko, Virgilio, Czata, Paris
Period Three: Scott, Wassilyn, Levin, Doherty
So they were sitting players in game 1 as well?I think we collectively have this figured out? Is this accurate?
Game 1
Period 1: Crete, Arrowsmith, DeWatcher, Cheynowski, Galiyinov
Game 2
Period One: Brauti, He, RR, AA, Flores
Period Two: NVV, Loshko, Virgilio, Czata, Paris
Period Three: Scott, Wassilyn, Levin, Doherty
So, it was 5 players, first period only, in game one and the remainder of the suspension, 5 players in the subsequent periods of game two. All on-ice suspensions are completed, now their off-ice suspensions take into immediate effects. The consequences for not following the off-ice suspension is severe.So they were sitting players in game 1 as well?
Are there any more players that need to sit or is that all of them now.
The league didn't mandate the specific punishment.I don’t think you quite understand it. This was league mandated amongst other requirements.
now their off-ice suspensions take into immediate effects.
...without getting into all the details, basically "house arrest" minus school and hockey.What is the "off-ice" suspension?
hhhhhmmmmm, how is that legal. Some of these players are adults with free will and Rights....without getting into all the details, basically "house arrest" minus school and hockey.
Sure, they can do whatever they want. No one is stopping them. However, the league can and will enforce the punishment set out for their deliberate defiance of the league's code of conduct policy. If a player(s) are willing to accept the punishment stated by the OHL, they can go to another movie tonight if they want.hhhhhmmmmm, how is that legal. Some of these players are adults with free will and Rights.
Anyway, was management or ownership disciplined?
Not sure. Also, just to clarify, the off-ice suspension is until the end of the season, which could be as early as Thursday or possibly Saturday evening.Isn't Landmark a sponsor too?