Maybe even a bit optimistic. If the IceDogs can just finish a perfectly middling 5-6 in conference / 10-11 overall after all the crying by some the team was ‘all-in’ just to squeak into the playoffs, it will have been a very good year imo.
Dirty we have seen teams that developed their players through the draft with the odd tweak, and lately, we have seen teams that build a little trade away all their picks so they have a good chance in the playoffs even if they are not able to win it all. Then they go back to being a bottom team for a year, a mid-to-low card team for a year then the 3rd year they trade all their draft picks away again and start over.
Personally as a fan If I knew what the owner was doing the Niagara plan seems to be the best.
If you look at a team like Ottawa under Kilrea or NB under Bert those teams were always a power. They never blew their brains out in trades and left the fans looking at the product coming back with high hopes. They always drafted well and got the most out of the players they drafted.
The Mavety system never appealed to me. As a first-round pick, you don't get ice time, and by the way, all you are to me is a trade chip.
Andlauer was feted for how good his teams were in the OHL, but they never won a M. They won the league championship and have been consistently at the middle or top of the league.
If Niagara is as competitive as Kingston in the playoffs, who is the real winner as an owner.
@ different owners that willhave gotten where they are by 2 different means.