League News: NHL Talk - (News n' Scores n' Stuff) | 2024-25 Summer Edition

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Metro Atlantic strength disparity (which may not last) wouldn’t matter as much if the playoff format entailed a crossover M1 v A4, M2 v A3, M3 v A2, M4 v A1 from the get go. Makes for more interesting 1st round matchups, and creates a greater likelihood of division rivals meeting deeper into the playoffs, which ups the intensity. This thing where we have 2 rounds of play against the same teams we’ve been playing all year makes no sense to me - but little that comes out of Gary Bettman’s head does
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ovechkins Wodka
Metro Atlantic strength disparity (which may not last) wouldn’t matter as much if the playoff format entailed a crossover M1 v A4, M2 v A3, M3 v A2, M4 v A1 from the get go. Makes for more interesting 1st round matchups, and creates a greater likelihood of division rivals meeting deeper into the playoffs, which ups the intensity. This thing where we have 2 rounds of play against the same teams we’ve been playing all year makes no sense to me - but little that comes out of Gary Bettman’s head does
Yea there are a lot of things media people complain about (season too long, not marketing stars enough, tv schedule not good, 2-1-0 points system, etc.) that I think are overblown to one degree or another. The playoff system is not one of them.

Not even about the "fairness" of it to me but just that these matchups get so boring
 
I’m a purist. Grew up watching the divisions battle it out to make it to the conference finals.

So I have no issue — like at all — with the playoffs structure.

I’m so draconian, that I miss ties and loathe the 3 on 3.

So 🤷🏻‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️
Seems to be a pretty unpopular opinion nowadays, but I miss ties too. I don't really know why, maybe nostalgia for the way they did things when I was a kid, maybe the uniqueness of being the only one of the big 4 sports where ties were a regular occurrence, but I'd really love to have them back. Can't stand shootouts, even when the Caps were good at them.

As for playoff formats, I just want something that's simple and easy to explain. The current format with the two wildcards is a pain in the ass to explain to new fans. Either get rid of the wild cards and go all in on the divisional thing by taking the top 4 from each division and having them all face off, or just make the division winners the top 2 seeds and then fill in the next 6 like the previous format. The hybrid approach is the worst of all worlds - you screw over teams from strong divisions while still not really making it a true divisional playoffs because of the wildcard crossovers.
 


Celebrini is going to be a good one. First GWG on a nifty shot (that maybe Talbot should have had). The Shark Tank might be a fun place to go again.
 
I’m a purist. Grew up watching the divisions battle it out to make it to the conference finals.

So I have no issue — like at all — with the playoffs structure.
I don’t mind it either but I also wouldn’t hate it if they mixed it up.

I’m just glad they’re the only big 4 sport that hasn’t expanded the playoffs. Not that I have an issue with other sports adding playoff spots - just think it would hurt the overall product if done in hockey.
 
Bruins home loss to CBJ last night was their first official non-sellout in over 15 years

If only the Senators and Sabres didn't suck, they might even miss the Playoffs.

I wouldn't mind, but i don't really see it. The only reason i really care is that the Caps own the Bruins 2nd rounder.
 
I don’t mind it either but I also wouldn’t hate it if they mixed it up.

I’m just glad they’re the only big 4 sport that hasn’t expanded the playoffs. Not that I have an issue with other sports adding playoff spots - just think it would hurt the overall product if done in hockey.
Another controversial take of mine but I think the play-in tournament in the NBA has worked really well and I would like to see something similar if the NHL expands past 32 teams. I think in general it doesn't really change the race for the last slot too much but also contrary to popular belief makes the regular season mean more as there's a more stark difference between being a six and a seven seed. It would also hopefully give teams more of a reason to stop tanking.

The NHL has also had a 16 team playoff for much, much longer than it has had 32 teams, expansion wouldn't be that unnatural
 
If only the Senators and Sabres didn't suck, they might even miss the Playoffs.

I wouldn't mind, but i don't really see it. The only reason i really care is that the Caps own the Bruins 2nd rounder.
I think seven teams from the east are already set: Florida, Toronto, Tampa, New York (R), New Jersey, Carolina, Washington. I don’t know that the Bruins make it… they are tied with San Jose for the 2nd worst GD at -21. They’re probably going to fire Montgomery soon to try and salvage the season.

I think my money is on Ottawa making it in. They’re playing well and had a tough schedule to start.
 
I think seven teams from the east are already set: Florida, Toronto, Tampa, New York (R), New Jersey, Carolina, Washington. I don’t know that the Bruins make it… they are tied with San Jose for the 2nd worst GD at -21. They’re probably going to fire Montgomery soon to try and salvage the season.

I think my money is on Ottawa making it in. They’re playing well and had a tough schedule to start.
With the current playoff points percentage line in the East sitting at .500, nobody is truly out of it (even Montreal), but Ottawa seems the most likely out of that group.

My sleeper pick would be Philly. They're heating up after a slow start, and they've also had a tougher schedule than many of the teams they're competing against.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexModvechkin8
Another controversial take of mine but I think the play-in tournament in the NBA has worked really well and I would like to see something similar if the NHL expands past 32 teams.
How many games in each play-in series? 3 or less seems like too much variance is involved, 5 or more and that puts the play-in teams at a huge disadvantage in terms of total games played
I think in general it doesn't really change the race for the last slot too much but also contrary to popular belief makes the regular season mean more as there's a more stark difference between being a six and a seven seed. It would also hopefully give teams more of a reason to stop tanking.
These are both good points
 
  • Like
Reactions: RedRocking
Another controversial take of mine but I think the play-in tournament in the NBA has worked really well and I would like to see something similar if the NHL expands past 32 teams. I think in general it doesn't really change the race for the last slot too much but also contrary to popular belief makes the regular season mean more as there's a more stark difference between being a six and a seven seed. It would also hopefully give teams more of a reason to stop tanking.

The NHL has also had a 16 team playoff for much, much longer than it has had 32 teams, expansion wouldn't be that unnatural
Agreed and I hate the NBA. If they keep adding teams expand the format a little.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad