NHL player rating formula | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

NHL player rating formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter In burke I trust*
  • Start date Start date

In burke I trust*

Guest
I've made a spreadsheet that includes even strength (5v5) player ratings for each individual NHL skater. The rating is based on statistics like goals, primary assists, secondary assists, relative +/-, quality of competition, flow (Off zone start: off zone finish ratio, converted into a +/- value) and even strength TOI. I just wanted to know what you guys think based on the Leafs ratings and the rest of the NHL. ***Only includes 5v5 Statistics***

Statistic Explanations:

Goals 5v5 (G): The number of even strength goals a player has scored throughout the duration of the regular season.
Primary Assists 5v5 (A1): The number of first assists a player has accumulated throughout the duration of the regular season (Valued at 67% compared to a goal).
Secondary Assists 5v5 (A2): The number of second assists a player has accumulated throughout the duration of the regular season (Valued at 33% compared to goal).
Relative Plus/Minus (+/-): On-Ice Plus-Minus minus Off-Ice Plus-Minus. This is expressed as a rate stat per 60 minutes.
Quality of Competition (Qoc): The Average Relative Plus-Minus of opposing players, weighted by head-to-head ice time.
Flow: Offensive Zone finish % divided by offensive zone start %, then multiplied by 100, and then subtracted by 100 resulting in a more easily measurable plus/minus value.
Even strength TOI (TOI/60): Minutes of 5v5 ice time per game.
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Lupul is the second best player in the league?

**** ya. What a boss

On a game-to-game basis this season, yes :yo: However, it is highly unlikely that he would be able sustain those numbers if he were to play a full season but it is still very impressive
 
alright, I kept looking and could tell something was missing haha... How'd you calculate the +/-?

This is not normal +/- but instead a relative value: On-Ice Plus-Minus minus Off-Ice Plus-Minus. This is expressed as a rate stat per 60 minutes.
 
Well then I think it's safe to declare it a pretty bullet proof formula...
...
...?

It can be useful when comparing the even strength effectiveness of hockey players while not focusing primarily on basic offensive production.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've made a spreadsheet that includes even strength (5v5) player ratings for each individual NHL skater. The rating is based on statistics like goals, primary assists, secondary assists, relative +/-, quality of competition, flow (Off zone start: off zone finish ratio, converted into a +/- value) and even strength TOI. I just wanted to know what you guys think based on the Leafs ratings and the rest of the NHL. ***Only includes 5v5 Statistics***

Statistic Explanations:

Goals 5v5 (G): The number of even strength goals a player has scored throughout the duration of the regular season.
Primary Assists 5v5 (A1): The number of first assists a player has accumulated throughout the duration of the regular season (Valued at 67% compared to a goal).
Secondary Assists 5v5 (A2): The number of second assists a player has accumulated throughout the duration of the regular season (Valued at 33% compared to goal).
Relative Plus/Minus (+/-): On-Ice Plus-Minus minus Off-Ice Plus-Minus. This is expressed as a rate stat per 60 minutes.
Quality of Competition (Qoc): The Average Relative Plus-Minus of opposing players, weighted by head-to-head ice time.
Flow: Offensive Zone finish % divided by offensive zone start %, then multiplied by 100, and then subtracted by 100 resulting in a more easily measurable plus/minus value.
Even strength TOI (TOI/60): Minutes of 5v5 ice time per game.


Love seeing stuff like this, will reference it a lot over the summer for fantasy purposes I'm sure.
Thanks for all the work McD, how long did it take to put this together?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad