Hartford is a no..... good luck trying to eject the Rangers from that market.... Milwaukee is also a no since the loss of the Bradley Center and FISERV. being designed as a Bucks/Marquette only facility..... Kansas City is a no as previously discussed in numerous threads hereIsn’t the metro population of New Orleans quite small? Surely it would be the smallest US market and it barely has any pre-existing hockey culture.
I suspect we’ll see a few more other interested cities mentioned here and there if the NHL feels like any of their preferred expansion cities (Atlanta, Houston, Phoenix) are dragging their feet.
KC, Milwaukee, Hartford, and Quebec are all surely do a cursory report of interest in the next year or two, I bet.
That’s sort of my point. The NHL will keep cycling through these markets with significant challenges—even if only to put pressure on their ideal markets to make their intentions and plans more concrete.Hartford is a no..... good luck trying to eject the Rangers from that market.... Milwaukee is also a no since the loss of the Bradley Center and FISERV. being designed as a Bucks/Marquette only facility..... Kansas City is a no as previously discussed in numerous threads here
what does your point of bringing Hartford/Milwaukee/KC up when it's been widely known that it's not realistic there...... Kansas City leadership doesn't want a pro sports team in their metro.... and if u read the reports from there.... both GEHA @ Arrowhead (Chiefs) and Kauffman Stadium (Royals) are looking to be replaced near-term if not sooner, if not relocating outright to the Kansas side of Kansas City, not MissouriThat’s sort of my point. The NHL will keep cycling through these markets with significant challenges—even if only to put pressure on their ideal markets to make their intentions and plans more concrete.
Well, at least if they decided to expand there, they'd for sure have a better shot at being more successful than either Atlanta or Phoenix.
how many threads have we had on this forum and others discussing Kansas City, Baltimore (remember the Carolina forum thread had they not retained Chicago (Rosemont) until this past offseason).... I cannot see San Diego either unless there's an upgrade in arena there..... Cincinnati is a red flag unless you want to turf pro hockey in that city.... after what THE Ducks did coming there from Baltimore to compete w/ the Cyclones, and luckily, Cincinnati survived the 2 team/league "experiment"NOLA is a small market (~1.3m). However, there was talk last year of a group in NOLA having stated to the press there that they wanted to bring the league to the region, so this really doesn't surprise me.
From where I sit, we have Atlanta and Houston penciled in as expansion locks, and two of Kansas City, Quebec City, San Diego, Cincinnati, and now New Orleans as the others on expanding to 36 total teams.
NOLA is a small market (~1.3m). However, there was talk last year of a group in NOLA having stated to the press there that they wanted to bring the league to the region, so this really doesn't surprise me.
From where I sit, we have Atlanta and Houston penciled in as expansion locks, and two of Kansas City, Quebec City, San Diego, Cincinnati, and now New Orleans as the others on expanding to 36 total teams.
You're right, I forgot Phoenix. My bad, Arizona folks!Phoenix is on that list. I don't see a scenario where New Orleans is, no matter how big of a check they want to write.
I don't think NOLA would work as an NHL market for a variety of reasons, but it's definitely interesting and a good sign for the league that there is interest in a franchise, no matter how serious. The size and corporate base are bigger issues than some of the other interested American cities but the arena situation (while not great) is probably the best out of any besides Houston.NOLA is a small market (~1.3m). However, there was talk last year of a group in NOLA having stated to the press there that they wanted to bring the league to the region, so this really doesn't surprise me.
From where I sit, we have Atlanta and Houston penciled in as expansion locks, and two of Kansas City, Quebec City, San Diego, Cincinnati, and now New Orleans as the others on expanding to 36 total teams.
you will not see NHL Expansion to any market in Missouri just to have a cross rivalry w/ St. Louis.... doubtful you'd see Cincinnati either..... that market almost became a footnote to hockey history after Anaheim forced their affiliate into that market after being no less than 40 miles from Monumental Sports and the Capitals.....I don't think NOLA would work as an NHL market for a variety of reasons, but it's definitely interesting and a good sign for the league that there is interest in a franchise, no matter how serious. The size and corporate base are bigger issues than some of the other interested American cities but the arena situation (while not great) is probably the best out of any besides Houston.
I would say that the two who can get their arena built/pony up the $1.5B first out of Atlanta, Houston, and Phoenix are locks. The other of those will be in the next wave with the best of KC/Cincinnati/NOLA/Omaha or another American market that hasn't had confirmed interest yet. As long as franchise valuations keep going up, expansion will keep happening until at least 36 teams, probably 40.
They will not be going back to Quebec City or anywhere else in Canada though unless there are some pretty big macroeconomic changes.
As a one-time Louisiana resident (about two hours away in Lafayette), I agree. I can definitely see NOLA taking another crack at the ECHL one day. The Brass actually did fairly well there until they got kicked out of the Smoothie King Center when the Pelicans (then the Hornets) came in, and the old Municipal Auditorium was essentially destroyed by Katrina (plus, it was in probably the worst section of town anyway), which left them with no place to play.As a former NOLA resident, those people are out of their minds if they think the NHL would work in NOLA.
I'm a firm believer that you can sell hockey in SEC football country if you just market it right. That's not the problem. The problem is market size, sports saturation and lack of wealth.
NOLA is the #54 CSA market in the US. It's the size of Buffalo and the Sabres are one of the bottom six economically in the NHL, and they HAVE a rich tradition in hockey NOLA doesn't.
NOLA also has an NBA team, which Buffalo doesn't. Per capita, each fan in Buffalo has to give their two major sports teams $371.40 per year for their teams to reach league-average revenue. (For comparison, Pittsburgh $242, Nashville $225, Tampa Bay $204, Seattle $145, Boston $111, LA $100).
New Orleans NOW with NFL/NBA is $406. And with the NHL would be $494.
Of course, the money doesn't all come from the fans, it also comes from corporate sponsorship; and NOLA has ONE Fortune 500 company, which is the power company with a monopoly in the region.
The cities I listed as possibly being in the running were based off of cities the league has mentioned within the last year or so, plus NOLA. It's not an indicator of what I personally feel would be a good fit for the NHL. The good fits still remains to be Houston, Atlanta, and Phoenix. Every other city has been mentioned, in one way or another, by Bettman or Daly as having shown interest.I don't think NOLA would work as an NHL market for a variety of reasons, but it's definitely interesting and a good sign for the league that there is interest in a franchise, no matter how serious. The size and corporate base are bigger issues than some of the other interested American cities but the arena situation (while not great) is probably the best out of any besides Houston.
I would say that the two who can get their arena built/pony up the $1.5B first out of Atlanta, Houston, and Phoenix are locks. The other of those will be in the next wave with the best of KC/Cincinnati/NOLA/Omaha or another American market that hasn't had confirmed interest yet. As long as franchise valuations keep going up, expansion will keep happening until at least 36 teams, probably 40.
They will not be going back to Quebec City or anywhere else in Canada though unless there are some pretty big macroeconomic changes.
the problem w/ the AHL option in New Orleans is the league bylaw that requires an NHL Partner..... doubtful Crelin can be convinced about a return there similiar to how St. John's collapsed w/o a resolution even though T/R continued once DSE collapsed afterall the infighting w/ SJSE WHICH is the primary reason the Leafs bolted for Coca Cola ColiseumAs a one-time Louisiana resident (about two hours away in Lafayette), I agree. I can definitely see NOLA taking another crack at the ECHL one day. The Brass actually did fairly well there until they got kicked out of the Smoothie King Center when the Pelicans (then the Hornets) came in, and the old Municipal Auditorium was essentially destroyed by Katrina (plus, it was in probably the worst section of town anyway), which left them with no place to play.
I can also see them taking a shot at the AHL, and can see that working if it's done right. The NHL is a whole different situation, though. Way to much money involved, and I don't think there's enough corporate support to make it sustainable in the long run.
They didn't force them to Cincinnati, the team and owner in Baltimore was losing money and sold. That whole saga is more than 20 years old at this point too -- Monumental Sports wasn't a thing and Leonsis didn't even own the Caps. A whole lot has changed in those 20 years in the NHL and pro sports in general, and the fate of a minor league team in the 90s doesn't mean anything about the long-term viability of hockey in a market.you will not see NHL Expansion to any market in Missouri just to have a cross rivalry w/ St. Louis.... doubtful you'd see Cincinnati either..... that market almost became a footnote to hockey history after Anaheim forced their affiliate into that market after being no less than 40 miles from Monumental Sports and the Capitals.....